Homosexuality is a Choice
Debate Rounds (3)
Arguments and Position:
1. Several scientific studies in the Unites States and Europe, such as UCLA's study on identical twin brother, spearheaded by scientists from the David Geffen School of Medicine discovered that methylation, a form of DNA modification, in certain regions of the genome differed between homosexual and heterosexual identical twin brothers. What they did not find were the elusive "gay genes."  No singular gene makes someone homosexual, ergo, our personal biology does not dictate our sexual prefrences.
2. The human X and Y chromosomes have been completely sequenced and mapped. Gene maps, sequenced in the human genome project, could not find any "gay" gene in the genetic structure of 153 million (X) and 50 Million (Y) pairs. 
Argument #1: Look at it logically, does choosing to be homosexual make sense? when you look at how homosexuals are treated this would be a clear no, some are killed which is even LEGAL to do making it even more stupid to be gay (https://www.washingtonpost.com...), besides that it also makes school significantly more difficult as you have to hide who you are most of the time for if you do not you will be a prime target to be bullied by allot of people and will most likely not have friends, the results of all this is that LGBT are up to 8 times more likely to commit suicide.
Argument #2: Look at nature, animals live by instinct do they not? and yet homosexuality has been found in over 500 species(https://en.wikipedia.org...) so clearly no choice was made.
My apologies if I did not respond in the correct format, this is my first time partaking.
1. People are treated differently for their beliefs or identities all the time. In fact, progressive leftism is by far the most mainstream ideology in North America, and the fact of the matter is that homosexuals are not just accepted, but praised in twenty-first century society. In Canada, 80% of the population supports homosexuality, and 60% do in the United States 
2. Animals have no sense of morality whatsoever. Unlike humans, animals have no sexual conscience with regards towards right and wrong, or natural or unnatural. This debate is about homosexual humans, not "homosexual" animals.
https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org...) it claims it cannot be said there exists a gay gene as it has not been proven however it does say 'it is tempting to claim that this study is concrete proof that sexual orientation is entirely genetic. To say so would be simplistic and, well, wrong. But it does constitute evidence that homosexuality has a biological basis.'
2. The source mentioned(TrueOrigin) makes claims about the 'twins study' that if there was a gay gene both twins would always be gay and since that is not the case it does not exist however genes can be 'inactive' (http://medicalxpress.com...) so it is therefore still possible for both twins to have a possible 'gay gene' but have it simply be inactive.
As previously stated, in the complete genetic map of human biological structure, a specific homosexual gene is non-existent. You argue that homosexuality may have a genetic or biological origin, however, fail to identify what this origin entails, or its effects on sexuality and mental health. Theoretically, if this gene existed, there is still no evidence to suggest that it would make someone "gay". The effects could trigger a mental disorder, which homosexuality was actually classified as until the mid 1970's when the gay rights movement suppressed the search for a cure . However, if this gene cannot be located specifically, after decades or research, it makes it clear that even if homosexuality was a disorder, it would be a very rare or uncommon disorder. Just look at the numbers, in our society, it is a choice.
Homosexuality has indeed be removed as a mental disorder as there has been no scientific evidence that it is a disorder (http://psychology.ucdavis.edu...) and because it is not a mental disorder, nor does it distress the person, there is no reason to search for a cure.
Your argument now is that because the numbers are low it is a choice and that is your only argument, which holds no value, same could be said for allot of diseases, for example only 900.000 people died to Tuberculosis, small number so that must mean they chose it, no, that is wrong and faulty logic.
It cannot be proven homosexuality is a choice it cannot be proven it isn't
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.