The Instigator
TAA
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
1dustpelt
Con (against)
Winning
55 Points

Homosexuals should receive the death penalty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
1dustpelt
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/6/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,485 times Debate No: 23439
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (5)
Votes (10)

 

TAA

Pro

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them" (Leviticus 20:13).
1dustpelt

Con

I accept.

Rebuttals
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them" (Leviticus 20:13)."
First, you do not prove WHY. Second, seeing you are a Christian, you must agree that Christ is the basic foundation of Christianity. Jesus is forgiving and definately would be against this. He does not condemn homosexualty. (1)

Contention 1: Jesus on homosexualty
Seeing you are a Christian, Jesus does not condemn homosexualty.(1) Even if he did, he would not support the death penalty for this.

Contention 2: Seperation of Church and State
This is protected by the First Amendment.

Contention 3: Why?
Seriously, why? They have not violated anyone's rights, so WHY?

Sources
1. http://www.jesusonhomosexuality.com...
2. http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
Pro is an idiot
Posted by SaviorsRep1010 5 years ago
SaviorsRep1010
I totally agree with the Con.

There is no reason for gay's to be sent to death. Gay's should have every right straight people have.
Posted by alex0828 5 years ago
alex0828
The Pro guy is an obvious troll. He joined 15 hours ago.
Posted by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
lol
Posted by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
I put agree with pro to be a troll.
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Microsuck 5 years ago
Microsuck
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious troll is obvious
Vote Placed by Stephen_Hawkins 5 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: trollsnipe 1
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Apparently I'm not suppossed to make prnis jokes in RFD's.... Fixing my vote
Vote Placed by mecap 5 years ago
mecap
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: EZ win... Pro didn't have an argument, just a Bible quote.
Vote Placed by Oryus 5 years ago
Oryus
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con actually debated. Automatic win for Con. Pro just gave a bible verse. They may as well have given a nursery rhyme to make their point.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: hi
Vote Placed by Maikuru 5 years ago
Maikuru
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offers no case.
Vote Placed by Nur-Ab-Sal 5 years ago
Nur-Ab-Sal
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had stronger arguments, as Pro only used the Bible to support his argument and never stated why the Bible should be utilised as state law. Con had more sources.
Vote Placed by LibertyCampbell 5 years ago
LibertyCampbell
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: In the opening round Pro had me convinced. Such an in depth look at morality and the value of human life. Then we get to CON, who just blows it out of the water and simply destroys all of Pro's claims, providing counter examples and showing Pro's appeal to authority to be out of context. [/sarcasm] Easy win for CON
Vote Placed by Mrparkers 5 years ago
Mrparkers
TAA1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Should be obvious why