"Hopefully we'll make it to Athens before nightfall" is bad grammar.
Debate Rounds (2)
Even though the usage of this word has changed, it is still incorrect to use it in a state other than an adverb.
"He played piano good." I hear this a lot... Does that mean it's correct if it is used a bunch? NO.. The correct way of saying that sentence is "He played the piano well" or "He ihass gotten good at playing piano."
My Opponent's Misconception
Being a writer myself, I share my opponent's passion for grammar; I do not, however, share his misapprehensions about the usage of adverbs. Pro seems to think that adverbs cannot begin a sentence or that they can't precede the word they are modifying, but neither of these misconceptions are true.
Just look at his very first sentence: "Technically, this word is an adverb[...]"
"Technically" is an adverb as well and is used validly in this case.
"Hopefully" is an adverb meaning "in a hopeful manner" or "it is hoped; if all goes well" and it is perfectly correct to use it as such at the very beginning of a sentence, such as "Hopefully, we'll make it to Athens before nightfall."
Dictionary.com even uses the word in a very similar manner in its example sentence: "Hopefully, we will get to the store on time."
In both sentences (my opponent's example and Dictionary.com's example), "Hopefully" is modifying the verb "will".
That being said...
The original sentence is still grammatically incorrect; there is a comma missing after "Hopefully" and there is no punctuation at the end of the sentence. However, the reason my opponent mentioned is, of course, incorrect.
SinceWhen forfeited this round.
Vote Con or vote for the downfall of the English language. Your choice.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: In this scenario, Pro lost since his contention that the sentence was a demonstration of "bad grammar" in the use of adverbs was negated, though the true reason why was the absence of a comma after "hopefully"....Note that Con stated the sentence was grammatically incorrect but not necessarily a sign of "bad" grammar (something that most likely demands a notable error)......Obvious win for Con in spelling, arguments, and at least sources...
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.