How to survive the Zombie Apocalypse
Debate Rounds (5)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: I can't believe I'm actually voting on this. Pro failed to show that zombies have feelings and would feel sorry. Con failed to show he has the ability to move the earth into the sun. Additionally his ship can only hold 3 people (him and a couple others). As such there is insufficient genetic diversity to maintain the species even if he should find a habitable planet with life that is nutritious to humans. While Con claims to be 362 years old his profile says that he is 13. As such he is a liar and cannot be trusted. Thus Pro's proposal is slightly more likely to succeed.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.