How was the world created
Debate Rounds (3)
3.Phenomena's and finally
All right I'll play your game nevertheless!
However I will not choose any of the theories you have provided me with.
I choose DIRECTED PANSPERMIA. Although this theory does not have much to do with how the physical world started, it is about how LIFE started. And I presume it shouldn't matter to you because the Gaia hypothesis does not have much to do with how the physical world started as well.
I look forward to this debate.
P.S. after this debate would you like to continue it in a new debate?
According to the theory of directed panspirmia, we came from the "seeds" that were "planted" into Earth from extraterrestrial civilizations.
To answer your question, we must go off topic from "How the world was created" to "Should we establish new planetary systems?" Of course I don't mind. I have no opinion of the matter so I will give the opinion shared my most Panspermiests. According to them, the point is to basically secure and expand our organic gene/protein life-form, especially because Earth as we know it is slowly turning incompatible with humanity. The moon is slowly pulling farther from Earth's gravity, he sun is slowly aging. Eventually, the Earth will not be suitable for life such as ours. If we want to preserve our race and other organisms on Earth, we must establish new planetary systems, just like the extraterrestrials did to spawn us.
P.S. I wouldn't mind continuing the debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.