Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns.
Debate Rounds (3)
emsnguyen forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||1|
Reasons for voting decision: The resolution is worded in the negative, and the Instigator took the Con position. Thus Con is affirming that people are not defined by what they own. Both sides agreed that is so, so the debate goes to Con. Resolution are supposed to statements affirmed by Pro. There is no excuse for con to have posed a double negative question as the topic, so conduct goes to Pro.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.