The Instigator
KingDebater
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
xXCryptoXx
Con (against)
Winning
21 Points

Humans are hollow.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
xXCryptoXx
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/4/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,022 times Debate No: 43386
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (12)
Votes (5)

 

KingDebater

Pro

My bud told me that there's stuff in humans, but I really don't believe him. If we had stuff in us, wouldn't we be "full" all the time instead of just only when we've eaten enough?

Also, he says that I am "full of myself", how can this be true when all of me is on the outside? I laugh out loud at his wrong idea, however I wasn't so open about it when he told it to me.

I mean I understand we have blood in us, but that's really on the outer layer instead of in us.

That's why I think humans are hollow, like the typical easter egg.

To prove we're not hollow to me in this debate, you'll probably have to have some video proof or something like that.

Thank you.

xXCryptoXx

Con



Since you wanted video proof.
Skip to 5:00 in.

Also those guys are wearing lab coats so it must be true.


But if you really wanted compelling evidence:

If humans are hollow why doesn't the wind blow them away?

Obviously they are full of something. I think must of the time they are full of crap. That's why they don't get blown away by the wind. Therefore humans are not hollow.
Debate Round No. 1
KingDebater

Pro

KingDebater forfeited this round.
xXCryptoXx

Con

I hear all that time that humans are full of "it".
I assume that what was in that human's body was the "it" they talk about quite a bit.
I guess that confirms that human's aren't hollow.
Perhaps that explains our ability to swallow.
It surely explains why humans don't get blown away by the wind.
Ha, that would surely be humanity's end.
Debate Round No. 2
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by brepar 3 years ago
brepar
and hollow is considered to be the lack of solid material, i.e. a hollow wall will most likely contain air, so dark energy is an invalid arguement.
Posted by brepar 3 years ago
brepar
all atoms are 99.99% vacuum, a lack of material. therefore all things are hollow.
Posted by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
I was too late to post my argument for two reasons:
a) I was too disgusted by the video con posted, and I'm pretty sure it violates the ToS somehow.
b) I got blown away in the wind because I'm hollow.
Posted by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
Aaaand I was only the best part of an hour late to start my argument.
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Technically speaking, the lungs are at any given time filled with only Oxygen or Carbon Dioxide, which kinda can be construed as evidence that people are indeed hollow....
Posted by Kreakin 3 years ago
Kreakin
Ignore my last post I'm stuck in the middle..
Posted by CreativeGenius 3 years ago
CreativeGenius
your too young and immature to be on here.
Posted by Kreakin 3 years ago
Kreakin
Yes, thank you, we know it's a troll post. Oh dear.
Posted by philochristos 3 years ago
philochristos
"you are either too young to even be on the internet or too stupid to know how to be."

Or maybe you just don't recognize a troll debate when you see one.
Posted by Kreakin 3 years ago
Kreakin
The "empty" space between the nucleus of an atom and the electron may be filled with "dark energy"?
It is therefore not easy to say if we like all matter are mostly hollow.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
KingDebaterxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro FF; Pro's arguments were not justified and not valid
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
KingDebaterxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit, and no continued jokes in this troll debate. It being two rounds effectively makes this an FF.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 3 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
KingDebaterxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins by a gruesome video making the best argument for him. Normally this wouldn't count but then again Pro wanted video evidence. Conduct goes to Con as Pro forfeited.
Vote Placed by Tophatdoc 3 years ago
Tophatdoc
KingDebaterxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con provided the evidence that human being are not hollow. Pro forfeited as well. Conduct goes to Con for this. Good luck to you both in future debates.
Vote Placed by campbellp10 3 years ago
campbellp10
KingDebaterxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FF