The Instigator
bephig
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Alcina_teen
Pro (for)
Winning
2 Points

Humans cannot never knowledge the true reality of the world

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Alcina_teen
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/27/2013 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 384 times Debate No: 41334
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

bephig

Con

Humans cannot never knowledge the true reality of the world?
Prove to me that there are parts of universe that humans can know, and another parts that humans cannot know.

First round is for acceptance.
Alcina_teen

Pro

I'll accept. This seems it'll be an interesting topic. Though before proceeding, could you possibly elaborate more on what I have to prove to you?
Debate Round No. 1
bephig

Con

You have to prove the possibility of some material, a living being, or else in the universe that humans can never perceive.
Alcina_teen

Pro

Alcina_teen forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
bephig

Con

Well my opponent forfeited, i think it means that i won.
Alcina_teen

Pro

Alcina_teen forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
OtakuJordan
Any questions addressed to you in the debate should be answered in the debate, not in the comments section.
Posted by bephig 3 years ago
bephig
"I'll accept. This seems it'll be an interesting topic. Though before proceeding, could you possibly elaborate more on what I have to prove to you?"

you have to prove the possibility of some material, a living being, or else in the universe that humans can never perceive.

Is clear enough?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TheGhostOfFreedom 3 years ago
TheGhostOfFreedom
bephigAlcina_teenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: The debate was misrepresented, conduct & grammar go to pro.