The Instigator
the_random_melon
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
DAN123
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Humpty Dumpty was a criminal and tried to rob a bank. That is why he fell off the wall.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
DAN123
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/11/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,118 times Debate No: 19234
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

the_random_melon

Pro

We think that yes, Humpty Dumpty fell off of a wall. What we are trying to prove is that Humpty Dumpty was a wanted criminal who was in the midst of robbing a bank when he fell. Our first argument is.... Why were all the kings horses, and all the kings men trying to get to him.we say it is because he was a robber. almost anyone could have helped him. the king was definitely trying to arrest Hmpty Dumpty.
DAN123

Con

I thank my opponent for issuing this debate to me. BoP will be on the side of Pro, for proving that humpty dumpty is a robber.

My opponent says that "... all the kings horses, and all the kings men trying to get to him... because he was a robber.almost anyone could have helped him. the king was definitely trying to arrest Hmpty Dumpty."

First of all, the story certainly doesn't say that the king's men were "trying to get him" because of robbery. secondly you said "almost anyone could have helped him. the king was definitely trying to arrest Hmpty Dumpty.", in fact somebody did hlep him, it was the king's men ang the king's horses contrary to what you're saying. Observe:

Humpty Dumpty sat on the wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall;
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again.

And if humpty dumpty was in the midst of robbing a bank the why did "humpty dumpty sat on the wall" ?

I want to ask my opponent for further clarification to what he is believing.
Debate Round No. 1
the_random_melon

Pro

the_random_melon forfeited this round.
DAN123

Con

i can't reply any further for my opponenet has forfeited
Debate Round No. 2
the_random_melon

Pro

the_random_melon forfeited this round.
DAN123

Con

VOTE CON!!!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Buckethead31594 5 years ago
Buckethead31594
the_random_melonDAN123Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious forfeit.
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
the_random_melonDAN123Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF