Your saying you can kill them because there not endangered. Humans are not endangered - can we kill humans? No. Do you know why? Because humans are alive, and so are whales. So you saying they were less important from birth. That's called discrimination. Finally, people have stopped rasism (discrimination of skin colour or country), but when will they stop rasism (discrimination of race)?
I see that this debate was accepted by someone who is opposed to killing of animals, not whales particularly. Which is not what I intended with this debate. I hope the voters will take into account when voting that my opponent is discussing whether we should kill animals or not, not whether we should kill whales.
You are against killing animals, so yes obviously whales too. However I intended for us to discuss whether or not it is wrong to kill whales, however you clearly in your first argument advocate why we shouldn't kill any animals at all, which is not what I intended for this debate. Your argument had nothing to do with whales, it had to do with animals in general.
"Your argument had nothing to do with whales, it had to do with animals in general." Whales are animals so it did have something to do with it. What I'm saying is that if we can't kill animals, there can't be questioning if we can kill whales or not since whales are animals.
Your argument for why non-endangered whales shouldn't be hunted is..
- humans aren't endagnered
- we value our own species more than animal
- discrimination of animal races on earth
I fail to see how any of those arguments have anything to do with the actual topic, which is about whales. You are CLEARLY advocating why we shouldn't kill animals, there is no question about that. That is not what I intended for this debate.