The Instigator
masterdrave
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Varrack
Con (against)
Winning
22 Points

I Am Psychic

Do you like this debate?NoYes-5
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Varrack
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/27/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,102 times Debate No: 78196
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (4)

 

masterdrave

Pro

I am a psychic. I've proven it before. Whomever accepts this debate, I will guess their full name (including their middle name) and the members of their family, to prove my case.
Varrack

Con

All right. Pro has the burden of proof to prove they are psychic. Pro must also guess my full name and my family members' names. If he/she fails, I win.

Let's go.
Debate Round No. 1
masterdrave

Pro

Your full name is littlefuckingcowardcunt. And your family, your sister/mother who you rape each night for your next illegitimate child. You sir are a shitstain in the fabric of society. Do yourself a favor and bleach yourself you monkey.

I win.
Varrack

Con

That is completely off, and is obviously incorrect even if one does not know my name, as a full name is not a string of words. In a full name, the first, middle, and last names are all separated by spaces. Pro's guess has no spaces, so it's clearly wrong.

Pro gives us no reason to believe they are psychic, and the burden of proof has not been fulfilled. So...vote Con by default!
Debate Round No. 2
masterdrave

Pro

masterdrave forfeited this round.
Varrack

Con

Pro never showed us that they are psychic. Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by whiteflame 2 years ago
whiteflame
****************************************************************
>Reported vote: AdventurerExplorer/ Mod action: NOT Removed<

7 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not conduct himself as good as Con did. The BOP Was on Pro which he failed to hold up on his part. I think everyone can say that Con has won

[*Reason for non-removal*] This debate seems like pretty clear trolling. We do not moderate troll debates.
******************************************************************************
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
Wow....
Posted by Rami 2 years ago
Rami
So, is this how it is? Pro makes a crazy statement, and if Con says he made it up, Pro will accuse Con of lying to protect his dignity. Nice move, @Drave.
Posted by MMcMahon36 2 years ago
MMcMahon36
That was uncalled for.
Posted by Rami 2 years ago
Rami
This is going to be interesting...
Posted by Alpha3141 2 years ago
Alpha3141
Im really skeptic of psychics, how do we know you didn't just research using the internet?
Posted by Alpha3141 2 years ago
Alpha3141
I wanna try!
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Discipulus_Didicit 2 years ago
Discipulus_Didicit
masterdraveVarrackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Wow. What a dick.
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 2 years ago
tajshar2k
masterdraveVarrackTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to prove he is side kick. And is conduct was poor
Vote Placed by AdventurerExplorer 2 years ago
AdventurerExplorer
masterdraveVarrackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not conduct himself as good as Con did. The BOP Was on Pro which he failed to hold up on his part. I think everyone can say that Con has won
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 2 years ago
Midnight1131
masterdraveVarrackTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF, and Pro did not fulfill their BOP, and failed to show that they were Psychic.