The Instigator
Insanity
Pro (for)
Winning
29 Points
The Contender
RationalMadman
Con (against)
Losing
20 Points

I, Insanity, will win this debate.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
Insanity
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/11/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,189 times Debate No: 28093
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (8)

 

Insanity

Pro

I am certain that I will win this debate. If anyone wishes to attempt to prove me wrong, then please, by all means, debate with me!
RationalMadman

Con

You will not win this debate because I am God and I have altered fate to make you not win it. Everything you say from this point on is definitely, 100% my control for your 'free will' and if you debate is strong it is actually me debating for you thus even though you win the debate by content this overall debate you, mere mortal Insanity, will lose since you, Insanity are in fact a mere representation of me, RationalMadman but in a different brain and mindset. You are now officially possessed by me and if your debate is stronger I win, if my debate is stronger, I win. I am sorry to tell you that due to difficulty in predicting the Madman half of my persona I do not know WHO I will grant the more convincing arguments to that is yet to be found out by my Rational mind (which I am utilising at present) Thank you , good night and try trolling when I'm offline.

xoxo -Gossip Girl
Debate Round No. 1
Insanity

Pro

Thank you for participating in this debate. I will begin by winning the debate.

Firstly, You admit to being a madman. Let us begin by defining this word:

A madman is a man who is insane. (http://www.thefreedictionary.com...)

So, yes, being insane, you posses me, but you do not control me. In fact, it is I, Insanity, who makes you think and act in the way you do, therefore I actually control you.

In this new light let us examine your opening statement. You say that: "You will not win this debate because I am God and I have altered fate to make you not win it."

I have proved that I control you. Therefore, theoretically speaking, if you were God, then I would be in control of God. So if you are God, then I will win because I will make you allow me to win.

Lastly, you have a win percentage rate of less than 50% (http://debate.org...)
So statistically speaking, you are more likely to lose than win.

In conclusion, I will win this debate.
RationalMadman

Con

As stated in round one, this was all my work via the mind of such a fine piece of "insanity."
Debate Round No. 2
Insanity

Pro

Ah, but theoretically, if your statement is true of controlling me is true, then you are only aiding me, for it is irrelevant whether you win or not. We are debating whether I will win. And if I win while being controlled by you, then I still win.
RationalMadman

Con

As stated in round one, this was all my work via the mind of such a fine piece of "insanity."
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by RationalMadman 4 years ago
RationalMadman
nice votebombing =.=
Posted by wrichcirw 4 years ago
wrichcirw
WHOA WAIT:

PRO said: "you, Insanity are in fact a mere representation of me, RationalMadman but in a different brain and mindset. You are now officially possessed by me and if your debate is stronger I win, if my debate is stronger, I win. "

THEREFORE, IF I VOTE FOR INSANITY, RATIONALMADMAN WINS. I CHANGE MY VOTE.
Posted by wrichcirw 4 years ago
wrichcirw
1) THE BEST VIDEO EVAR = source points to CON.
2) CON said "I am God and I have altered fate to make you not win it. " PRO did not refute this.
3) However, PRO said "Thank you for participating in this debate. I will begin by winning the debate." CON did not refute this.

Therefore, it's a tie.
Posted by wuywieuiuoshdf 4 years ago
wuywieuiuoshdf
Hi buddy :

HOT SELL Product Brand is below: ==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====
,nike shoes,air jordan shoes,nike s h o x shoes,gucci shoes ,true religion jeans, ed hardy jeans,coogi jeans,affliction
jeans, Laguna Beach Jeans,ed hardy T-shirts,Coogi T-shirts,Christian Audigier T-shirts,Gucci T-shirts,Polo T-shirts,coach
handbag,gucci handbag,prada handbag,chanel handbag .
free shipping
New to Hong Kong : Winter Dress
New era cap $9
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike s h o x(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18
Come back tomorrow for another Daily Dose of Style! Bookmark this page >>
give you the unexpected harvest

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.scnshop.com... ) =====
Posted by RationalMadman 4 years ago
RationalMadman
clearly people fail to grasp my round one debate intellectually.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by The_Master_Riddler 4 years ago
The_Master_Riddler
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:16 
Reasons for voting decision: This is your first debate. He has more exp. than you. But you get one point for effort.
Vote Placed by Azul145 4 years ago
Azul145
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro will win
Vote Placed by utahjoker 4 years ago
utahjoker
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave one round
Vote Placed by wrichcirw 4 years ago
wrichcirw
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: see comment
Vote Placed by GorefordMaximillion 4 years ago
GorefordMaximillion
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: We must show that certainty is an illusion, therefore pro cannot win the debate. Con behaved better, conduct. Con's grammar was more understandable, grammar. Con had stronger arguments and Con's source (himself) was more reliable as he is God. (The bible says God is infinitely reliable)
Vote Placed by pdog 4 years ago
pdog
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: i wunt pro to lose
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 4 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made arguments in the first round and didn't leave the last round blank as per the DDO norm for contenders opening the debate. He also basically threw the last 2 rounds by re-asserting his position rather than dealing with Pro's arguments. As pro stated, the resolution is on whether or not pro will win, which means it's irrelevant whether con controls him or not if he still wins.
Vote Placed by jchung1029 4 years ago
jchung1029
InsanityRationalMadmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: trolololol