The Instigator
Labrat228
Pro (for)
Losing
12 Points
The Contender
knick-knack
Con (against)
Winning
54 Points

I Should Have Won All Of These Debates.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
knick-knack
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/29/2008 Category: Politics
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,113 times Debate No: 5583
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (9)
Votes (10)

 

Labrat228

Pro

Hello, Debate.org has a great problem, VOTE BOMBING! Its not just one group of people who is doing it either, regardless of the situation IT MUST BE STOPPED NOW. I have listed debates I should have won below, I would like for all of you to check these debates and vote as you feel.

http://www.debate.org...
My opponent offered no rebuttals and forfeited the final round.

http://www.debate.org...
My opponent forfeited every round.

http://www.debate.org...
My opponent again forfeited every round.

This vote bombing BS must stop now.
knick-knack

Con

Dude sorry to tell you but as of September 29th 2008 at 8:58 Mountain standard time...

You're winning all of these.

Close case :^)+[
Debate Round No. 1
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by cmrnprk07 8 years ago
cmrnprk07
Lebrat,
Sorry, but you are beyond wrong on this one! Your premise is that you "SHOULD HAVE" won said debates, regardless of the voters opinion. What ever happened to objective observation? The voter votes according to HIS/HER opinion, not the OPINION of the debater, Pro, or Con. Your argument in a debate could be so weak that even a forfeiture on your opponent's part may not rescue your argument. I can give you examples of previous debates where my theory applies, but I believe that you are not interested in fact, rather your opinion. Be VERY careful what you wish for!
I believe that ANY and EVERY vote should be accompanied by an ISP address, therefore reducing the obvious abuse of 1 person, multiple accounts (VOTE BOMBING+).
I do not understand your outrage. Please state categorically for this forum that you have NEVER voted on a debate based on mutual belief rather than critical observation, regardless of the debater's political and religious position.
Posted by knick-knack 8 years ago
knick-knack
Should you have won this debate?
Hey labrat do you think that you got vote bombed this time?
Hmmm.....
Just something to think about.
Posted by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
Yeah, semantics is a pretty ineffective spell against the voters nowadays. Now semanticaga on the other hand, would be more useful. It's too bad you don't learn until until you reach lvl 65.
Posted by Labrat228 8 years ago
Labrat228
Not a Fail at all, the debate completed its intended pupose, without starting a voting bloc to win some debates.
Posted by jason_hendirx 8 years ago
jason_hendirx
e-e-e-e-e-e-e-epic failure
Posted by PoeJoe 8 years ago
PoeJoe
Don't cast semantics. You start off with an untrue premise; ergo, any conclusion you come to is faulty. Because you, labrat, bear the burden of proof, default vote goes to CON.
Posted by knick-knack 8 years ago
knick-knack
How could you should have if already have won...

Huh?
Posted by Labrat228 8 years ago
Labrat228
My opponents R1 still doesn't dispute the fact that I should have won them. He doesn't even say I shouldn't have won them.
Posted by PoeJoe 8 years ago
PoeJoe
Just message your friends and ask them to look at your debates like the rest of us.
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by pickpocket094 8 years ago
pickpocket094
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Littleweasle 8 years ago
Littleweasle
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:43 
Vote Placed by cmrnprk07 8 years ago
cmrnprk07
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Labrat228 8 years ago
Labrat228
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by spinnerclotho 8 years ago
spinnerclotho
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Zerosmelt 8 years ago
Zerosmelt
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:16 
Vote Placed by knick-knack 8 years ago
knick-knack
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by PoeJoe 8 years ago
PoeJoe
Labrat228knick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03