The Instigator
FIGHTTHEPOWER29
Pro (for)
Winning
17 Points
The Contender
Buddamoose
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

I Will Not Contradict Myself !

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
FIGHTTHEPOWER29
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/12/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,223 times Debate No: 21089
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (14)
Votes (3)

 

FIGHTTHEPOWER29

Pro

I've recently seen a couple of these debates, and I think it will be fun to participate in one.

==Rules==

1. From rounds 1-4 Con shall ask 10 Pro Yes/No answers.
2. If this occurs, Pro may explain why the answer is neither Yes or No.
3. Con may point out any contradictions from rounds 2-4, but no new contradictions may be pointed out in round 5.
4. Definitions of words shall not be abused - the first definition from a dictionary shall be taken.
5. If I am found to be contradictory, Con wins.
6. If I am not found to have made a contradiction, I win.

If any rules are violated, all 7 points must be given to the other person.

By accepting this debate, my opponent agrees with my rules.

I look forward to a great debate round whoever accepts :')
Buddamoose

Con

I accept the rules with one more rule that should i feel should be added, you must answer all questions(as that was never stated). My questions are as follows

1)Are you liberal?
2) Are you conservative?
3) Are you libertarian?
4) Do you agree with this statement? "Corporations should be taxed."
5) Do you think an income tax is necessary?
6) Do you agree with this statement? "corporations are people?"
7) Are you republican?
8) Are you Democrat?
9) Are you independent(unaffiliated)?
10) Do you agree with this statement? "I believe corporations should be allowed a voice in government(Super PAC's, lobbying, etc.)."
Debate Round No. 1
FIGHTTHEPOWER29

Pro

Q.1 Are you a liberal ?

A.1 Yes

Q.2 Are you Conservative ?

A.2 No

Q.3 Are you libertarian ?

A.3 Yes

Q.4 Do you agree with this statement? "Corporations should be taxed."

A.4 Yes

Q.5 Do you think an income tax is necessary?

A.5 Yes

Q.6 Do you agree with this statement? "corporations are people?"

A.6 Yes

Q.7 Are you republican?

A.7 No

Q.8 Are you Democrat?

A.8 Yes

Q.9 Are you independent(unaffiliated)?

A.9 If you mean am I an independent person then yes I am. I don't know any kind of political ideology that is labeled "Independent".

Q.10 Do you agree with this statement? "I believe corporations should be allowed a voice in government(Super PAC's, lobbying, etc.)."

A.10 Yes
Buddamoose

Con

Independent simply refers to having no association with any political party. Not an ideology at all. Anyways

I forfeit lol, i highly doubt youll contradict yourself.
Debate Round No. 2
FIGHTTHEPOWER29

Pro

Hmm I don't know what to do.. Since he forfeited I guess I win.. But there are still like 2 rounds left... What to do, what to do -.-
Buddamoose

Con

Random Letters?

AJSJDJFROTKDJDKROTJFJDKDKRIFKCK

and now for lower case!!!

Woeitnxnakeotkcnsodjfkaueorkcj
Debate Round No. 3
FIGHTTHEPOWER29

Pro

:O LETTERS !!! :D Lmosbpib2ibfnIPBnfoejniNEIFPKN2 ipkdneipo2kwnqmPI;DKN3EIWPKpidfn 3p2qikPIDBN3EPOIK;HNidhnpdp2ihpdrihvip2nhri Hahaha :D

Supercalifragilisticexpiadodocious ! :p
Buddamoose

Con

Round 4

ajsjdwirotmxnchaoe
Debate Round No. 4
FIGHTTHEPOWER29

Pro

It was great posting up letters with you :D

Vote Pro because Con forfeited !

Howdidthewoodchuckchuckifthewoodchuckcouldn'tchuckwood
Buddamoose

Con

He didnt, woodchuck is just the name, not the action =O

Vote pro cause i forfeited
Debate Round No. 5
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
Howmuchwoodcouldawoodchuckchuckifawoodchuckcouldn'tchuckNORRIS?
Posted by Buddamoose 4 years ago
Buddamoose
lost interest rather quickly too, definitely more prefer debates that are well, actual debates lol
Posted by Buddamoose 4 years ago
Buddamoose
Yeah, shouldnt of accepted it in the first place. Given enough time to study the questions it would be easy enough to ensure no answers are contradictory to any others. Lol, quite the excercise in futility indeed.
Posted by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
A forfeit already?
Posted by FIGHTTHEPOWER29 4 years ago
FIGHTTHEPOWER29
Sorry about the vagueness.
Posted by TheTrollHater 4 years ago
TheTrollHater
Ok. Sorry for the misconception. Your first round argument is a little vague.
Posted by FIGHTTHEPOWER29 4 years ago
FIGHTTHEPOWER29
It depends on the question. If you ask a question where I can answer yes or no I will but if you ask a question where I can't answer yes or no then I will explain why i can't answer yes or no.
Posted by TheTrollHater 4 years ago
TheTrollHater
Wait, what to you want? All of your answers will be neither yes nor no?
Posted by FIGHTTHEPOWER29 4 years ago
FIGHTTHEPOWER29
Stephen_Hawkins gets it..
Posted by Stephen_Hawkins 4 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
"Well if its a question like do you like the color blue, its opinion based and maybe you just have no opinion on it."

Response to question "Do you like colour blue?"

Neither yes nor no are correct: I am apathetic to the colour.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by THEBOMB 4 years ago
THEBOMB
FIGHTTHEPOWER29BuddamooseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: .
Vote Placed by PlanetTutTutTurtle 4 years ago
PlanetTutTutTurtle
FIGHTTHEPOWER29BuddamooseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision:
Vote Placed by Stephen_Hawkins 4 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
FIGHTTHEPOWER29BuddamooseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: poor debate.