The Instigator
vardas0antras
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ethopia619
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

I am Koopin

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
ethopia619
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/3/2010 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,357 times Debate No: 13897
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (41)
Votes (6)

 

vardas0antras

Pro

I am Koopin and when writing this debate, I listened to this song:

KFC.

Definition: Koopin is a Debate.org character which tends to do certain things, for example Koopin is keen to say "KFC" regularly for no good reason, obviously that's not all Koopin usually does but lets not get into that.

My arguments:
1. I said that I am Koopin and its more likely that I'm telling the truth. This is because people tell more truths than lies in general.
2. I said "KFC" Koopin tends to say this a lot for no good reason.
3. My avatar is the one Koopin would use.
4. I enjoy listening to "Magic Dance" like a true Koopin that I am!
5. I am a Christian, unlike those other non-koopins!
6. KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC

In conclusion I am Koopin unlike my opponent who has yet to provide evidence that he is Koopin. Furthermore he has to refute my evidence.
ethopia619

Con

KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC

I accept your definition and debate.

1) I'm Christian, too!

2) I'm telling the truth.

3) KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC

4) My avatar is the same.

5) I love "Magic Dance."

My arguments:

1) My opponent lives in Russia, though Koopin lives in Georgia.

2) My opponent is 71 years old, though Koopin is 17.

3) My opponent has different sides to the BIG ISSUES than Koopin.

4) Koopin has a 90.72% win ratio. However, my opponent does not.

5) I am Koopin. I am 17 and I live in Georgia, unlike my opponent.

6) My name is Kevin!

7) KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC

In conclusion, my opponent is not Koopin.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

I thank my opponent for this great debate! KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC

I rest my case. Thank you. KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC
Debate Round No. 1
vardas0antras

Pro

Arguments:
1. My opponent is also Koopin
2. My home nor my age nor my look on big issues effect my position. The same goes for ones win ratio and name.

Explanation:
1.I argue that I'm Koopin and by my definition there can be more than one Koopin. Indeed there is a little Koopin in everyones heart. My definition of what is a Koopin cited: "Koopin is a Debate.org character which tends to do certain things,".
2.These differences which you mentioned do not change the way I act. Since I tend to spam KFC [1] all the time and that is what a Koopin tends to do, I win.

Q.Wouldn't that make some of your argument irrelevant?
A.Indeed.

Sources:
[1]http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

KFC and Vote for Koopin !!!......The Koopin who took the Pro side. Vote Pro!
ethopia619

Con

Thank you for this wonderful debate!

Note: The topic states, "I am Koopin" not "I am A Koopin." Therefore, you have to state you are Koopin, the debate.org character that has a 90.72% win ratio. Therefore, many of you arguments are useless.

"My opponent is also Koopin." Thank you. You agreed to my point. Now, I will state why you are not Koopin.

In response for his argument 1, since you stated, "I'm Koopin", doesn't that mean that you're stating, "I am Debate.org character...." Therefore, you are not Koopin. Your definition is false, (with your wording.)

Look, I'm spamming KFC!

J.Kenyon states that you are an impostor.

KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC

I rest my case. KFC KFC KFC. Thank you. KFC KFC KFC.

http://www.debate.org...

Logic
Debate Round No. 2
vardas0antras

Pro

Lets begin!

To respond to your note, I have to say that I am Koopin when one applies my definition. Koopin is a character which does certain things. So when I say that I am Koopin, I mean that I am a character which does certain things. The emphasis is placed on how one acts and not what one is. Which is why I ultimately win.

Yes you too are Koopin though not as Koopinish as me.

I can state what kind of character I am and still be it. For example I am an extrovert meaning that I talk a lot, now just because I said that I'm an extrovert automatically Im not?

J.Kenyon should change his mind soon because I the mighty Koopin send few white vans near his house! Furthermore I am who I am and if someone says that I am not who I am that doesn't mean that I am who I am not.

Note: I hope my opponent won't try to change the definition at the last round! Is that even allowed?

I recommend my readers some KFC and to vote Pro!

KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC
ethopia619

Con

Thank you for this awesome debate! KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC

My opponent stated in round 1, "My avatar is the one Koopin would use." He now does not have his chicken with a candy cane figure. Therefore, he is not Koopin.

In round 1, you stated that you were Christian. However, on your profile, it states that you are not saying you religion. Therefore, you could be lying about your "Christian" thing.

J.Kenyon has not changed his mind yet, so you are still an impostor.

You stated that you were mighty. Yeah, right. If you were mighty, wouldn't that mean that you would win every single debate? Do you? No. Therefore, you aren't mighty.

I would like the readers to buy some KFC while they read this debate. Vote Con!

KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC KFC
Debate Round No. 3
41 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vardas0antras 6 years ago
vardas0antras
@ethopia619
I know, I didn't expect that, if I were you I would have simply not voted at all, it seems that you're more just than I am. Those two on the other hand:
http://www.debate.org...
You can talk about it with Mirza yourself, you know, to hear a good explanation which I didn't get.
Posted by ethopia619 6 years ago
ethopia619
@ vardas0antras

I vote fairly.
Posted by ethopia619 6 years ago
ethopia619
Hey!
Posted by vardas0antras 6 years ago
vardas0antras
*Sigh* At first Mirza and now m93, what is it with you and bias votes? Yes I am challenging m93 to a debate.
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
"I would like the readers to buy some KFC while they read this debate. Vote Con!"

Fail. At the last full sentence of the debate.
Posted by vardas0antras 6 years ago
vardas0antras
I am a Christian. I don't live in Russia nor am I over 60 years old but I am a Christian.
Posted by vardas0antras 6 years ago
vardas0antras
Did you know that KJV contains errors? Now you do!
Posted by vardas0antras 6 years ago
vardas0antras
YOU TOOOOOOOOOOOOO AREEE KOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN? Well from this I conclude that this is SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

oH AnD kFC
Posted by SuperRobotWars 6 years ago
SuperRobotWars
I AM KOOPIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! KFC/Sparta!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by vardas0antras 6 years ago
vardas0antras
Just makin' useless comments
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by gavin.ogden 6 years ago
gavin.ogden
vardas0antrasethopia619Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by knucklepuk 6 years ago
knucklepuk
vardas0antrasethopia619Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Captain_Ronnie 6 years ago
Captain_Ronnie
vardas0antrasethopia619Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by ethopia619 6 years ago
ethopia619
vardas0antrasethopia619Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by SuperRobotWars 6 years ago
SuperRobotWars
vardas0antrasethopia619Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
vardas0antrasethopia619Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03