I am Proud to Announce...

I am proud to announce that I have recently acquired the position as head of Debate.org.

I plan on allowing this site to reach a new horizon and achieve better, higher standards than other sites we may have competition with such as createdebate.com.

My opponent has the burden if proof to prove:

He will make us better then before
He is the leader

Let's look into these points

===Is he the leader?===

Although juggle is ultimately the leader, one must look into whether or not he is at their level. On DDO the highest ranking members (other then juggle representatives) are elected officials. Every sixth months we hold elections. We recently held one, and my opponent was not elected. If you look at all the elected officials, my opponent us none of them (1).

So, his options now is juggle representative or site owner. He is not the sure owner -- juggle is -- Look at the copyright at the bottom of the screen.

He is not a representative, as if he was he would have notified us upon arrival. Therefore he is not representative.

He is not DDO elite as innomen gave the names, "boris" wasn't listed.

He is not our leader.

===Will he make us better?===

No he won't, he's a troll.

(1) http://www.debate.org...

You are ignoring the most blatant facts.

He is attempting to trick you into believing that I am a troll, when it is actually he who is the troll. He may speak of Jumbo the Leader or something, but that is clearly just a complex lie.

If any of you have useful comments, then please look at my forum.

"You are ignoring the most blatant facts."

Please provide us and enlighten us with your hidden knowledge...

"He is attempting to trick you into believing that I am a troll, when it is actually he who is the troll. He may speak of Jumbo the Leader or something, but that is clearly just a complex lie."

1. How am I the troll? I follow the rules of the site, debate, and dont post useless debates claiming I am the leader...
2. How is this a lie? Its not even complex. We gain leaders through elections, elections where held a month ago. You weren't even on the ballot.

"If any of you have useful comments, then please look at my forum."

1. Nice source for me, there is much more proof you are a troll on the forum [1]. How do trolls make the site superior?

**My case**

My opponent never responded to my case. Extend all points.

CON wins.

[1] http://www.debate.org...

I take offence at the fact that you reached the most undesirable verdict that I am a troll. How dare you!

If you look at the facts, then you will most obviously see that I have displayed no blasphemy in my writings, in fact I find that it is you making the outrageous claims. You claimed something odd like: "Boris isn't the leader", when that is obviously a huge lie. How you dare to say something like that astonishes me.

You even went as far as to say that I wasn't on a ballot list, well, democracy doesn't work - embrace the future! Embrace freedom! Embrace Boris! (Good cuddles!)

"I take offence at the fact that you reached the most undesirable verdict that I am a troll. How dare you!"

You have offered no other conclusion with evidence, therefore my conclusion stands.

"If you look at the facts, then you will most obviously see that I have displayed no blasphemy in my writings, in fact I find that it is you making the outrageous claims. You claimed something odd like: "Boris isn't the leader", when that is obviously a huge lie. How you dare to say something like that astonishes me."

You have offered no evidence to the contrary, and as you have the burden of proof but have no evidence its an automatic loss. All of your points are assertions with NO evidence or logic, and therefore have no significance in the arena of debate.

My analysis has shown you hold no power amongst the current positions that have it.

"You even went as far as to say that I wasn't on a ballot list, well, democracy doesn't work - embrace the future! Embrace freedom! Embrace Boris! (Good cuddles!)"

Current leaders dont campaign, therefore this proves you are not a leader [yet] and therefore your claim fails.

Conclusion:

Its obvious con wins.