The Instigator
Charlie_Danger
Pro (for)
Losing
14 Points
The Contender
I-am-a-panda
Con (against)
Winning
37 Points

I am a panda

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
I-am-a-panda
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/30/2009 Category: Science
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,439 times Debate No: 9369
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (13)
Votes (9)

 

Charlie_Danger

Pro

I am a Panda, who often disguises himself as a teenaged male to help hide from the crushing popularity he would otherwise have from being discovered.

Here is one of my old profile pictures: http://i0006.photobucket.com...

I challenge you, my friend, because your name was my first choice, and I am disgruntled at the fact that I am the actual panda.
I-am-a-panda

Con

I thank Charlie Danger for this debate.

I am currently in the understanding I must negate the resolution by proving Charlie Danger is indeed, not a Panda.

Firstly, I will show you proof Charlie Danger is in fact a human:

The name of that Youtube channel - CharlieWanlessVideos (http://www.youtube.com...) - Matches Charlie Dangers given name on DDO - Charlie Wanless (http://www.debate.org...). Furthermore, he acknowledges it's his video in this forum (http://www.debate.org...)

It is clear Charlie Danger isn't a Panda.

Back to my opponent.
Debate Round No. 1
Charlie_Danger

Pro

I thank my opponent for his acceptance of this debate.

Like I stated in my constructive, I disguise myself as a human to avoid the crushing media attention I would otherwise receive.

The links my opponent posted are, in fact, in my possession, but the human who acts in them is under my control. If you watch closely in the video, and rate it five-stars, you can see how nervous he gets, knowing that if he screws the video up, he will be tortured again. He is basically a p*ssy, so he obeys my rule.

In short, my opponent has not, and cannot, prove that I am the actual one in these videos, pictures, and blogs, because it is actually the human that I keep as a slave to perform my bidding.

Thus you affirm.
I-am-a-panda

Con

I thank Charlie for his response.

My opponent claims that he is a Panda who uses the human Charlie Wanless as a slave. I will disprove this claim:

In this Photo (http://tinyurl.com...), Charlie is clearly in a public area. Any Panda would be quickly spotted. Charlie would also have a chance to make his big escape.

Charlie also lives in Arizona. Arizona is primarily comprised of desert (http://tinyurl.com...). This is not prime bamboo growing area. Therefore, it is unlikely Charlie, or his Panda master would have to funds to acquire edible bamboo to keep the Master Panda alive, without people noticing.

Slaves don't play guitar to the skill this photo shows: http://tinyurl.com...

Negated.
Debate Round No. 2
Charlie_Danger

Pro

Firstly,
He claims that in the first photo (I will label the photos 1,2, and 3 respectively as opposed to re-pasting them) I would have been able to been seen. However, he does not consider who might be behind the camera. Alas, it was me, though I didn't take the picture (these hands can only do so much...) I was next to the camerawoman. I believe the mixed pressure of me (a life-threatening master) and her (a very sexy girl) more than kept him where he was.

His second claim states that I would never be able to live in Arizona since there is insufficient bamboo. http://www.debate.org... In this album, I show the bamboo in my yard.

As for the guitar, well, you really haven't heard him. He's terrible.
I-am-a-panda

Con

I thank Charlie for this date

I will disprove him in one shot. Picture 1(http://www.debate.org...) contains people in the background, two to the upper right corner, one below Charles chin, and another and what appears to be a human figure to the centre far left. If a Panda and a sexy woman were behind the camera, the police would be rung and the Panda would be put in captivity followed by Charlies' escape.

Clearly, there isn't a Panda behind the camera, thus Charlie wouldn't be in this picture (http://www.debate.org...) other than to fool people is a Panda. Ergo, Charlie is not a Panda.

NEGATED
Debate Round No. 3
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by radioactivepotatoman 8 years ago
radioactivepotatoman
This is why I joined DDO.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 8 years ago
I-am-a-panda
"I don't know if this is actually grammatically incorrect, but it sounds funny. Indeed implies a positive but your implying a negative...Any insight?"

- Do you use a problem with 'The man is positively a negative effect on our community'?
Posted by Alex 8 years ago
Alex
"is indeed, not a Panda."

I don't know if this is actually grammatically incorrect, but it sounds funny. Indeed implies a positive but your implying a negative...Any insight?
Posted by creeping_death 8 years ago
creeping_death
lol wtf?! thanks for the laugh
Posted by Charlie_Danger 8 years ago
Charlie_Danger
JohnGotti,
Yeah, you see, us people with actual debates on our records like to do things like this. You should try getting above the 0.0% percentile and try it.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 8 years ago
I-am-a-panda
It's called a fun debate
Posted by JohnGotti 8 years ago
JohnGotti
is this debate really happening. very professional
Posted by Charlie_Danger 8 years ago
Charlie_Danger
lol

Great debate, Panda. Thanks alot. :)
Posted by Maikuru 8 years ago
Maikuru
Nice try, Charlie. By the way, that final picture is just...priceless.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 8 years ago
I-am-a-panda
NOTE: I used Tinyurl to shorten the link. Don't expect shooped photos of a nude Charlie.
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by radioactivepotatoman 8 years ago
radioactivepotatoman
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Charlie_Danger 8 years ago
Charlie_Danger
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by patsox834 8 years ago
patsox834
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by atheistman 8 years ago
atheistman
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by studentathletechristian8 8 years ago
studentathletechristian8
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Xer 8 years ago
Xer
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 8 years ago
RoyLatham
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Maikuru 8 years ago
Maikuru
Charlie_DangerI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05