I am always right
Debate Rounds (3)
Just because you have a piece of paper (Phd) does not make you unhuman. Unless you are a robot or a computerized program - you are a human and you will make mistakes weither you like it or not. You will be wrong at some times - a piece of paper does not effect that.
Trollology is not a real PhD, it is a fake internet fad that someone made up and you follow. It is not a certified PhD by a college or state university and therefore - is not reliable. Once again, just because you have a piece of paper does not make you right 100% of the time - that is absolutely obsurd. Nobody is perfect - and neither are you.
It's not just a piece of paper, it is a diploma.
Nobody is 100% right all of the time - it is not humanly possible. Your arguments were completely obsurd. Vote CON
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by cathaystewie 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||3|
Reasons for voting decision: BOP is on PRO to prove a) that the PhD is even valid and b) that PhD = omnipotence, neither of which pro has fulfilled. Pro's entire argument can be summarized into "I am always right because I say so". Pro actually delegates the obligation of proving his burden onto Con, and asking Con "Do you have proof?" etc. Thus, I must grant this debate to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.