The Instigator
Occisionis
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
sara_ann_dee
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

I am always right

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
sara_ann_dee
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/15/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 349 times Debate No: 77708
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)

 

Occisionis

Pro

I'm always right because I have a PhD.
sara_ann_dee

Con

Just because you have a piece of paper (Phd) does not make you unhuman. Unless you are a robot or a computerized program - you are a human and you will make mistakes weither you like it or not. You will be wrong at some times - a piece of paper does not effect that.
Debate Round No. 1
Occisionis

Pro

Oh but it does! I am in fact 100% right all the time! I have a PhD so I know what I'm talking about. I am in fact more accurate than any robot or program. Would you like proof of my PhD?
sara_ann_dee

Con

Trollology is not a real PhD, it is a fake internet fad that someone made up and you follow. It is not a certified PhD by a college or state university and therefore - is not reliable. Once again, just because you have a piece of paper does not make you right 100% of the time - that is absolutely obsurd. Nobody is perfect - and neither are you.
Debate Round No. 2
Occisionis

Pro

Do you have proof? I am 100% right all the time because I am 100% right all the time. It's not hard to understand.
It's not just a piece of paper, it is a diploma.
sara_ann_dee

Con

Nobody is 100% right all of the time - it is not humanly possible. Your arguments were completely obsurd. Vote CON
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Occisionis 1 year ago
Occisionis
How awesome would it be if I won every single debate because I have a PhD.
Posted by SmartSoda 1 year ago
SmartSoda
Con is better.
@Pro Even IF you have a Ph. D., you only have it in a certain subject. If you know everything, then what is the 389,293,398,989,398 vigintillionth digit of pi?

@Con Robots can still be wrong, since they are made by humans. :)
Posted by Occisionis 1 year ago
Occisionis
There is no point voting for con because I'm always right 100% of the time.
Posted by canis 1 year ago
canis
I teach PHD`s. And they are only right when they think they are...
Posted by Commondebator 1 year ago
Commondebator
DAMN IT right when i was about to accept it someone else did!
Posted by Occisionis 1 year ago
Occisionis
Let's debate about it.
Posted by Commondebator 1 year ago
Commondebator
are you right about not being right?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by cathaystewie 1 year ago
cathaystewie
Occisionissara_ann_deeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: BOP is on PRO to prove a) that the PhD is even valid and b) that PhD = omnipotence, neither of which pro has fulfilled. Pro's entire argument can be summarized into "I am always right because I say so". Pro actually delegates the obligation of proving his burden onto Con, and asking Con "Do you have proof?" etc. Thus, I must grant this debate to Con.