I am the user know as interrogator.
| Started: | 6/23/2011 | Category: | Entertainment |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,376 times | Debate No: | 17210 |
 Pro  Con I came here not looking for answers. But to share with you my experiences in life, and delight you with my wit as well as my charm. My perspective may baffle your mind at first, and it may seem unreal. Through time as your conscious minds begin to broaden your awareness, you will have realized that you have been touched by the hands of enlightenment. The truth as strange as it may be, will come to light for all to see. Please do not be confused. This fried chicken guy, named Koopin, is not me. He will NEVER be me. But he is a worthy opponent. And I shall win this debate at every cost. |
 |
|
Pro Intro: Hello everyone. I would like to thank myself for acepting this wonderful debate. I will be referring to my other account as "my opponent." At any point my opponent wishes to forfeit, he may do so. Many people may be thinking, "Another funny/fake Koopin debate." Think what you will, but first let me ask you something. What is your favorite game, chess or checkers? I think that the best game is checkers. It is said that those who are smart love chess. Now back to the debate. Reasons for my case: Nonentity.
“WHOEVER THAT WAS, STAY AWAY FROM MY GAL! THE CANADIAN IS IN LOVE WITH ME! NOT YOU!” (1) It is clear that Koopin thinks she is cute too. Now, I would ask the audience to look at this post, from interrogator: “Nonentity. Hello there my little African flower.” (2) Aha! So now we see that both Koopin and myself (my opponent) thinks that Nonentity is cute. This shows that maybe, Koopin is just trying to complement nonentity from two different accounts. (Smooth Koopin is smooth.)
Now lets move on.
My slip up: I made a thread titled “Interrogator needs a new name.” I made a slip up when I responded to Cody on my Koopin account. I said: “Good idea cody bear. Smart name. I will change it.” (3) This is even more evidence, to show that I am interrogator.
Our similar likes: Interrogator has stated that he likes KFC. I have said that I like KFC in one of his forums, and he agreed with me. I then stated that most other brands of chicken are not good, he agreed with me again. (4) I would like to thank my opponent for this debate. I will stop here because I don’t want to go into deeper details when they are not needed. Alone non of these things prove my case, but if you at the all of the evidence you can see it is very likely.
Sources: (1). http://www.debate.org... (post 2) (2). http://www.debate.org... (post 7) (3). http://www.debate.org... (post 9) (4). http://www.debate.org... (page 2,3) Con myself otherwise. Let the threads speak for itself. By the way. I am a lover of key lime pie as well. Some of you know that is my guilty pleasure. And by the way. How did you know I had a crush on that Canadian girl. Cheater. |
 |
|
Pro Intro: I would again like to thank myself for this wonderful debate. Since it is obvious I am the interrogator, not much will be said. Argument: My opponent says that he is the one and only, but fails to show why or how. He does state that he loves key lime pie. He stated this more than a month ago. I replied to this thread, telling him I also liked key lime pie. And he said thank you. This is even more proof to support my case. See the source if you don't believe me. (1) My opponent asks how I knew he had a "crush on that Canadian girl?" Obviously because he is me. Thank you for this debate. I believe it is clear for anyone and everyone to see that I am the user known as interrogator. Sources: (1). http://www.debate.org... Con |
 |
| Koopin | interrogator | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
| Koopin | interrogator | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 6 | 0 |
| Koopin | interrogator | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
| Koopin | interrogator | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
| Koopin | interrogator | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Is it the cow with it's wonderful milk?
My favorite is the chicken. The chicken is needed for eggs.
What is yours?