The Instigator
Koopin
Pro (for)
Winning
24 Points
The Contender
interrogator
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

I am the user know as interrogator.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+6
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Koopin
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/23/2011 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,658 times Debate No: 17210
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (5)

 

Koopin

Pro

Yes, my dear friends, I am interrogator. I hope that myself will accept this debate, and that I will have a good time.
interrogator

Con

Hello ladies and genlemen. I am the Interrogator. Very outspoken, provocative, intense, and controversial in every way.
I came here not looking for answers. But to share with you my experiences in life, and delight you with my wit
as well as my charm. My perspective may baffle your mind at first, and it may seem unreal. Through time as your conscious minds begin to broaden your awareness, you will have realized that you have been touched by the hands of enlightenment. The truth as strange as it may be, will come to light for all to see. Please do not be confused. This fried chicken guy, named Koopin, is not me.
He will NEVER be me. But he is a worthy opponent. And I shall win this debate at every cost.
Debate Round No. 1
Koopin

Pro

Intro:

Hello everyone.

I would like to thank myself for acepting this wonderful debate.

I will be referring to my other account as "my opponent."

At any point my opponent wishes to forfeit, he may do so.



Many people may be thinking, "Another funny/fake Koopin debate."

Think what you will, but first let me ask you something.


What is your favorite game, chess or checkers?
I think that the best game is checkers.
It is said that those who are smart love chess.



Now back to the debate.


Reasons for my case:



Nonentity.


Obviously this girl is pretty cute. Someone wrote an anonymous letter saying how cute she was. Koopin’s response was:

“WHOEVER THAT WAS, STAY AWAY FROM MY GAL! THE CANADIAN IS IN LOVE WITH ME! NOT YOU!” (1)

It is clear that Koopin thinks she is cute too.

Now, I would ask the audience to look at this post, from interrogator: “Nonentity. Hello there my little African flower.” (2)

Aha! So now we see that both Koopin and myself (my opponent) thinks that Nonentity is cute. This shows that maybe, Koopin is just trying to complement nonentity from two different accounts.

(Smooth Koopin is smooth.)

Now lets move on.

My slip up:

I made a thread titled “Interrogator needs a new name.” I made a slip up when I responded to Cody on my Koopin account. I said: “Good idea cody bear. Smart name. I will change it.” (3)

This is even more evidence, to show that I am interrogator.

Our similar likes:

Interrogator has stated that he likes KFC. I have said that I like KFC in one of his forums, and he agreed with me. I then stated that most other brands of chicken are not good, he agreed with me again. (4)
He agrees with me on the death penalty, Drug Legalization, Euthanasia, and much more. (5)


I would like to thank my opponent for this debate. I will stop here because I don’t want to go into deeper details when they are not needed. Alone non of these things prove my case, but if you at the all of the evidence you can see it is very likely.

Sources:

(1). http://www.debate.org... (post 2)

(2). http://www.debate.org... (post 7)

(3). http://www.debate.org... (post 9)

(4). http://www.debate.org... (page 2,3)

(5). http://www.debate.org...

interrogator

Con

I am the Interrogator. I am the one and only. This is a mockery of greatness. I see no need to try and prove
myself otherwise. Let the threads speak for itself. By the way. I am a lover of key lime pie as well.
Some of you know that is my guilty pleasure. And by the way. How did you know I had a crush on that Canadian girl.
Cheater.
Debate Round No. 2
Koopin

Pro

Intro:

I would again like to thank myself for this wonderful debate. Since it is obvious I am the interrogator, not much will be said.


Argument:
My opponent says that he is the one and only, but fails to show why or how.

He does state that he loves key lime pie. He stated this more than a month ago.
I replied to this thread, telling him I also liked key lime pie. And he said thank you.
This is even more proof to support my case. See the source if you don't believe me. (1)

My opponent asks how I knew he had a "crush on that Canadian girl?"
Obviously because he is me.


Thank you for this debate. I believe it is clear for anyone and everyone to see that I am the user known as interrogator.


Sources:
(1). http://www.debate.org...
interrogator

Con

For the last time. I am the Interrogator. Everyone knows this. Good bye.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by 1dustpelt 2 years ago
1dustpelt
lol
Posted by Koopin 2 years ago
Koopin
I'm just kidding, he is not me.
Posted by 1dustpelt 2 years ago
1dustpelt
I thought you were only alowed to have one account.
Posted by SuperRobotWars 3 years ago
SuperRobotWars
This debate is making me cry . . . *sob*
Posted by Koopin 3 years ago
Koopin
lol @ the RFDs
Posted by Marauder 3 years ago
Marauder
some 'wholehearted' attempt to disprove Koopin intergator. you barely posted anything, and koopin sourced stuff.
Posted by Koopin 3 years ago
Koopin
What kind of farm animal do you like?
Is it the cow with it's wonderful milk?
My favorite is the chicken. The chicken is needed for eggs.
What is yours?
Posted by Koopin 3 years ago
Koopin
I meant to put "Known"
Posted by OMGJustinBieber 3 years ago
OMGJustinBieber
Koopin's got this one in the bag.
Posted by interrogator 3 years ago
interrogator
Koopin. No, you are not me. And I will prove that wholeheartedly.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Marauder 3 years ago
Marauder
KoopininterrogatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: this is exactly how a debate would go if interrogator was debating himself.
Vote Placed by Double_R 3 years ago
Double_R
KoopininterrogatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't even bother to refute. Pro is obviously the interrogator. Con is correct that Pro is a cheater, they both are since the interrogator has two accounts and is debating himself so he'll win either way. Yep, cheater for sure.
Vote Placed by GMDebater 3 years ago
GMDebater
KoopininterrogatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: con is a troll and did not even argue. Pro, you convinced me. You ARE the interrogator.
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 3 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
KoopininterrogatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Impressive loss, see if you can debate him on again if he is not interrogator.
Vote Placed by OMGJustinBieber 3 years ago
OMGJustinBieber
KoopininterrogatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con just reiterated his stance providing no evidence or counter-evidence.