The Instigator
spiderman12345
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
STALIN
Con (against)
Winning
26 Points

I am the worst debater

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
STALIN
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/12/2014 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 779 times Debate No: 43825
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (8)
Votes (7)

 

spiderman12345

Pro

I am the worst debater
STALIN

Con

There are definitely debaters who are worse at debating than you are.
Debate Round No. 1
spiderman12345

Pro

Reasons
I make bad claims
I suck at refuting
I got hacked
I am the worst at arguing
I basically can only beat noobs
STALIN

Con

"I make bad claims"

There are times when even I make bad claims. And I have a win ratio of 85%.

"I suck at refuting"

Many debaters suck at refuting. This is common. Over time you will learn how to improve your refuting.

"I got hacked"

This debate isn't about getting hacked. Your goal is to prove that you are the worst debater on DDO. Getting hacked has nothing to do with debating. This arguments does not support your position.

"I am the worst at arguing"

Proof?

"I basically can only beat noobs"

If you can beat noobs then this means that there are people who are worse at debating than you are. This argument contradicts your position.

Pro has a win ratio of 0%. Here are some other people who have the same win ratio:

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

This shows that there are other people who are just as bad as debating as you are. I think I have proved that you are not the worst debater on DDO.
Debate Round No. 2
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by Dragonduelist 3 years ago
Dragonduelist
But his account is closed
Posted by Dragonduelist 3 years ago
Dragonduelist
Your not the worst debater hoer23 is the worst
Posted by spiderman12345 3 years ago
spiderman12345
You see this proves I cant beat anyone in a debate
Posted by spiderman12345 3 years ago
spiderman12345
Look at this debate and see that I am losing
Posted by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
Animals should be slaughtered they taste delicous.
Posted by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
Pro, you have not debated that racism is good, that racism doesn't exist, that white people are underprivileged, that sexism is good, that sexism doesn't exist, that men are underprivileged, that homophobia is good, that animals should be slaughtered, that CSA wasn't racist, or that 9-11 was caused by the government. (I have seen each of these debates). You have refrained from insulting other debaters. Really, compared to many on this website, you are a debate saint.
Posted by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
Dairygirl4u2c is the worst debater on this site in my opinion.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
spiderman12345STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con proved that there were worse debaters than pro.
Vote Placed by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
spiderman12345STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro gave small and non-detailed arguments. Con gave sources.
Vote Placed by Josh_b 3 years ago
Josh_b
spiderman12345STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: how wonderful. Stalin is being empathetic. this earns him conduct point and it seems convincing to me that pro really isn't the worst debater.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
spiderman12345STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was contradictory and failed to be convincing. Oddly, Pro's losing might be evidence for her/his position lol. Gotta love paradoxes. But not enough of course to change the outcome. Goes to Con.
Vote Placed by TheNamesFizzy 3 years ago
TheNamesFizzy
spiderman12345STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: nice
Vote Placed by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
OtakuJordan
spiderman12345STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Hard noob snipe, but w/e. We all do it. Anywho, Stalin won by basically showing that none of Pro's claims can be substantiated.
Vote Placed by theta_pinch 3 years ago
theta_pinch
spiderman12345STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had sources; kind of. Con also showed that Pro's arguments were contradictory.