The Instigator
Prodigenius
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
mananlak
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

I can debate nothing. :)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
mananlak
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/16/2013 Category: News
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 726 times Debate No: 33785
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

mananlak

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
Prodigenius

Pro

Am I a madman?

Am I rational?

I don't even know but I think I am a monster though. :)
mananlak

Con

By your statement, I am assuming that you mean you cant debate anything.
Defintion of debating:
To engage in argument by discussing opposing points.(http://www.thefreedictionary.com...)
You have been in many debates thus far, and therefore are able to debate. You have, most certainly, engaged in arguemnts while discussing an opposing point. Therefore, whether you win or not, yuo have debated something.

Debate Round No. 2
Prodigenius

Pro

I have debated something but nonetheless I CAN debate nothing.
mananlak

Con

There is nothing to debate about nothing, because nothing doesn't exist. Nothing is nothing, and there isn't nothing you can debate about nothing. NOTHING!

(I don't even know anymore, as I seem to have forgot how to science.)


http://www.nothing.net...
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by True2GaGa 3 years ago
True2GaGa
what is nothing?
Posted by Marauder 3 years ago
Marauder
ah man, I just missed out on accapting. I was going to 'argue nothing' is a tautology and thus it is not something Pro could ever do much like saying even with omnipotence you could not make a square circle. Being a meaningless statement its rhetorical demands by there very nature cannot be fufilled
Posted by Prodigenius 3 years ago
Prodigenius
the answer to your question lies in the resolution. :)
Posted by Zealous1 3 years ago
Zealous1
So what is Con arguing?
Posted by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
lol.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by TheSaint 3 years ago
TheSaint
ProdigeniusmananlakTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con showed that pro had debated before on this site. That means he had debated something, and since this debate wasn't specified as the debate that he wasn't going to be debating con proves that Pro had debated something before.
Vote Placed by ufcryan 3 years ago
ufcryan
ProdigeniusmananlakTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:43 
Reasons for voting decision: Hilarious debate
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
ProdigeniusmananlakTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: George Takei didn't make any sense in this debate. Con countered what he had to and with that, BOP was not met.