The Instigator
DATXDUDE
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
famousdebater
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

I din't say it.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
famousdebater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/24/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 327 times Debate No: 81489
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (3)

 

DATXDUDE

Pro

Well howdy der, wen wll i see ther isn't ner FLEEEEEERRRRR ! BABAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY
famousdebater

Con

... I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
DATXDUDE

Pro

Well das wert I sayn bby Wut ru doin?
famousdebater

Con

Since the title of the debate is, I didn't say it. I propose that the burden of proof is on my opponent to prove that they did not say the word 'it'. If they can prove to me that they did not say the word it, then they win this debate. If they do not, then they lose the debate.

If my opponent contests with their burden of proof then I will be happy to discuss this too since we have 8000 characters to do so.

The definitions of the terms in the resolution are simple and no semantics shall be used. The undefined words (all of the words) should be interpreted using common sense. If you do not understand or cannot define a term logically or sensibly. You can refer to the Oxford diction ary by typing: "define ____" into Google.
Debate Round No. 2
DATXDUDE

Pro

No, the resolution is "I din't say it", not "I didn't say it. Stop trying to noobsnipe.
famousdebater

Con

Since 'din't' is not a real word, the only dictionary that actually contained it as a word was the Urben dictionary.

It is defined as: did not. The example sentence was: "No I dint!" - this backs up my interpretation of the word and therefore I urge voters to vote con!

I am not noob swiping since I am also new to the site and you joined the site before me.

Sources

http://www.urbandictionary.com...;
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: I-DrankYourMilkShake// Mod action: NOT Removed<

7 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: He is a famous debater, why not vote for him?

[*Reason for non-removal*] Troll debates are not moderated.
************************************************************************
Posted by DATXDUDE 1 year ago
DATXDUDE
Ok, I'll challenge you.
Posted by KingofEverything 1 year ago
KingofEverything
Debate a jokes debate with me, I am bored as well.
Posted by DATXDUDE 1 year ago
DATXDUDE
Sorry everyone: I only started this debate because I was REALLY bored.
Posted by Lexus 1 year ago
Lexus
Con you're toxic 'af.
Posted by famousdebater 1 year ago
famousdebater
This was more pointless than a Vi_Spex debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Sarai.K82 1 year ago
Sarai.K82
DATXDUDEfamousdebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Tough debate to judge. I was left unpersuaded by Pro's side. Pro didn't really offer me any source or evidence that would confirm his position. I thought con's interpretation was reasonable.
Vote Placed by I-DrankYourMilkShake 1 year ago
I-DrankYourMilkShake
DATXDUDEfamousdebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: He is a famous debater, why not vote for him?
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
DATXDUDEfamousdebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't post an argument due to this the arguments go to Con. Con is the only one to have used a source, so those points go to him. Pro had horrific grammar like chopping of words and lack of capitalization. Due to this those points go to Con.