The Instigator
Calvincambridge
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
Joseph_Mengele
Con (against)
Winning
32 Points

I have no clue

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/4/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,638 times Debate No: 18175
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (8)

 

Calvincambridge

Pro

Joe you have never been in a debate I would like to change that lets debate
Joseph_Mengele

Con

Ok...I'm not really sure what I did to get challenged by you...

But I would just like to point out the flaw with Pro's argument claiming that I havn't been in a debate yet, whenever it is a clear fact that I'm currently in one.

My Debate:

http://www.debate.org...
Debate Round No. 1
Calvincambridge

Pro

I would like you to decide what we debate about and I realized that after I started this debate.
Joseph_Mengele

Con

I would like to thank my opponent for posting their argument.

How about we debate about tobacco rights? I notice that you are Con, and I am Pro tobacco rights. Even though we have 1 round left for debating lol, you should probably challenge me again, or you can finish this debate with me, and I will bring no new arguments at round 3 (Just rebuttals). Your choice.
Debate Round No. 2
Calvincambridge

Pro

Ok lets debate that
Joseph_Mengele

Con

LOL!

Pro says, "Ok lets debate that." without even saying what he believes about tobacco rights. It would be unfair for me to post new arguments or in this case any arguments in the last round due to the fact that Pro can't refute them, so I guess this is really all I can say.

I would just like to point out Pro's error that he made in round 1 saying, "Joe you have never been in a debate I would like to change that lets debate". I was in a debate before this, so this being the only argument, I suppose it can be the only resolution as well.

The resolution and the argument is negated, vote con.

This...has been an interesting debate.
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by bossyburrito 4 years ago
bossyburrito
Did you just apologize seven months later????
Posted by Connor666 5 years ago
Connor666
apologies to those i offended
Posted by Connor666 5 years ago
Connor666
RaCIAL BROTHER!
Posted by BennyW 5 years ago
BennyW
It's difficult to decide how to vote because although it J_M clearly dominated, the title says I have no clue and pro seemed to prove that to be true.
Posted by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
Excellent debate. Calvin, thank you for lowering this site to its knees even further...
Posted by Joseph_Mengele 5 years ago
Joseph_Mengele
I notice that we disagree on healthcare. Perhaps we can debate about that?
Posted by Joseph_Mengele 5 years ago
Joseph_Mengele
Calvincambridge you can debate to with me anything concerning racial profiling, forced integration, illegal immigration, god vs. no god...
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
oh i'm watching that one.
Posted by Joseph_Mengele 5 years ago
Joseph_Mengele
@thett3

Perhaps you should look at my other debate.
Posted by Joseph_Mengele 5 years ago
Joseph_Mengele
@thett3

Lol, yea I know.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Effort.
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Idiotic debate. Pro should learn that discussion like this is far better suited for the forums, not in the format of a debate. Con successfully negated Pro's points (or, since he made no argument whatsoever, statements). I congratulate Pro for proving that he was a troll even further...his lack of effort in his debates is proof of this.
Vote Placed by curious18 5 years ago
curious18
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:34 
Reasons for voting decision: Calvin successfully proved that he had no clue.
Vote Placed by kohai 5 years ago
kohai
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is a real troll..
Vote Placed by Cerebral_Narcissist 5 years ago
Cerebral_Narcissist
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Full kudos to CON for managing to be challenged by someone who makes him look clever.
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 5 years ago
Ore_Ele
CalvincambridgeJoseph_MengeleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made no debate what so ever. Such conversations about "what should we debate" are best done either in the forums, or in PMs prior to setting up debates.