The Instigator
Sweaty-Creases
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Vaibanez
Con (against)
Winning
18 Points

I like Nachos

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/13/2010 Category: Religion
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,073 times Debate No: 10834
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (3)

 

Sweaty-Creases

Pro

I like nachos. Prove me wrong.
Vaibanez

Con

I know everything.
Since I know everything, I know I'm not lying about my claiming to know everything, because I would know if I were lying about knowing everything, which I'm not.
I know for certain you do not like nachos.
Therefore you do not like nachos.
Debate Round No. 1
Sweaty-Creases

Pro

Sweaty-Creases forfeited this round.
Vaibanez

Con

I forward my argument.
Debate Round No. 2
Sweaty-Creases

Pro

Sweaty-Creases forfeited this round.
Vaibanez

Con

I forward my argument again.
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
CON wins.
Posted by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
Well it does not matter now, Pro failed to prove anything.
Posted by Logical-Master 7 years ago
Logical-Master
PRO wouldn't have to prove jack squat. When you make a claim, you have the burden of proving it. CON must prove that he knows everything.
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
PRO would have had to ask CON about some event happening at some time in the future, like "What's the title of the next thread that comoncents will make?"
Posted by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
Even though this debate is just a n00b debate, con has a good argument.
Pro must prove that Con does not know everything. Or he must prove that he likes nachos.
Posted by Ore_Ele 7 years ago
Ore_Ele
The only thing better would have been if he put Q.E.D. at the end of his post.
Posted by Ore_Ele 7 years ago
Ore_Ele
Way to go con! That ends it right there.
Posted by ciphermind 7 years ago
ciphermind
Funniest Con Ever.

Seven points to con unless pro can top the humor.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by DylanFromSC 7 years ago
DylanFromSC
Sweaty-CreasesVaibanezTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 7 years ago
Logical-Master
Sweaty-CreasesVaibanezTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by ciphermind 7 years ago
ciphermind
Sweaty-CreasesVaibanezTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07