The Instigator
doomswatter
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points
The Contender
SBDEBATER1
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

I might be God

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
doomswatter
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/5/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 584 times Debate No: 56109
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (9)
Votes (4)

 

doomswatter

Pro

As agreed on by PM, here we go:

Resolved: I might be God.

Round 1: Acceptance Only
Round 2: Arguments
Round 3: Rebuttals and Closing
Debate Round No. 1
doomswatter

Pro

My resolution is that I might be God.

Might: Used to indicate a possibility [1]
Possibility: The fact or state of being possible [2]
Possible: Capable of happening, existing, or being true without contradicting proven facts, laws, or circumstances. [3]

So we see that in order for my resolution to be true, there has to be a possibility that I am God. Looking at the definition of "possible", unless my opponent can present proven facts, laws, or circumstances showing that there is no possibility of me being God, my resolution stands.

Good luck, Con.

----
[1] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...
[2] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...
[3] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...
SBDEBATER1

Con

Well Pro I have some questions for you if you do not mind my asking?

How was the earth created?
Are you forever Immortal?
Yes I looked at the definition of Possible...In all actuality the possibility of you being God is a 1 in a million. With that said one last question..... Why did you create Roaches? Just wondering.
Debate Round No. 2
doomswatter

Pro

Q: "Well Pro I have some questions for you if you do not mind my asking?"

A: Of course not. Ask away.

Q: "How was the earth created?"

A: Just the way God wanted it to be.

Q: "Are you forever Immortal?"

A: Is there a temporary immortal?

Q: "Yes I looked at the definition of Possible...In all actuality the possibility of you being God is a 1 in a million."

A: You are confusing possibility with probability.

Q: "Why did you create Roaches?"

A: Who says I created roaches?

On to the next round!
SBDEBATER1

Con

If god didn't create Roaches then who did?
As for probability yes I got them confused.
"God is the ultimate being in existence perfect in power, love and character. God came to earth in human form as Jesus of Nazareth to teach us about himself and to provide the ultimate sacrifice for our sins..."

With that said The PROBABILLITY of you being God is 1 in a million.

http://www.godandscience.org...
Debate Round No. 3
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
somebody could have trolled this by arguing against the existence of God. :P
Posted by SBDEBATER1 2 years ago
SBDEBATER1
Why thank you
Posted by Unspired 2 years ago
Unspired
Nice Q&A going on there :)
Posted by SBDEBATER1 2 years ago
SBDEBATER1
And if u didn't notice we were tied lol if we had a few more rounds I could have won.
Posted by SBDEBATER1 2 years ago
SBDEBATER1
There was no way I was gonna lose nor win it was a lose lose situation.
Posted by doomswatter 2 years ago
doomswatter
It was almost impossible for you to win, so I guess you did OK, considering. You have to be very careful when accepting a debate about possibilities.
Posted by SBDEBATER1 2 years ago
SBDEBATER1
Lol this was a good debate. I had fun. You did very well. In your opinion how did I do
Posted by SBDEBATER1 2 years ago
SBDEBATER1
Lol this was a good debate. I had fun. You did very well. In your opinion how did I do
Posted by doomswatter 2 years ago
doomswatter
I forgot it was only three rounds.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
doomswatterSBDEBATER1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: troll much?
Vote Placed by ChadIrvin 2 years ago
ChadIrvin
doomswatterSBDEBATER1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't make any good arguments and said nothing to motivate me to vote in his/her favor.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
doomswatterSBDEBATER1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: In round 2 con admits pro may be god. Had pro not made that statement he would have won, because pro had the BOP here and actually failed to provide any arguments to support his resolution.
Vote Placed by Raymond_Reddington 2 years ago
Raymond_Reddington
doomswatterSBDEBATER1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con picked an un winnable debate here. BoP was on con because the resolution only stipulated that pro might be god. Cons probability argument was pointless and did nothing for him. He failed to fulfill his burden.