I think Rouge decks in Yu-Gi-Oh are better than Meta decks.
Debate Rounds (3)
Here I don't need to make much of an argument as my opponent has even pratically conceded to the debate as he claims that it depends on the deck, which already creates a semantical concession by my opponent as the debate resolution here is an absolute and as Con, all I have to do is find one issue where the resolution defended by Pro is faulty and I win the debate. He concedes this by conceding to Atlanteans being a good deck despite the fact that they are indeed a meta themselves, creating a pratical concession in this debate by my opponent.
Yes, I will agree that it depends on the cards you run. Lets face it, there aren't any decks or archetypes that focus on stopping tribute summoning, I think. While some archetypes have some sort of out to a certain card, that's about it. For example, Madolches have an Xyz monster that can spin 2 cards the opponent controls into the deck (without targeting). Neo-Spacians have Grand Mole and can be splashed in with other decks.
I'm going to extend the fact that my opponent has once again conceded to the fact that Meta decks are indeed good and even with a small mixture, he still concedes his stance in the debate allowing me to win by default.
Thank you and please vote Con.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.