The Instigator
DATXDUDE
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Balacafa
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

I want my truck back.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Balacafa
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/15/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 458 times Debate No: 79772
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

DATXDUDE

Pro

My toy truck was stolen. Plz help:(
Balacafa

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
DATXDUDE

Pro

Can i habb truck bac?
Balacafa

Con

No, my opponent has used poor grammar and my opponent has provided no evidence that he has even lost his truck. As well as this my opponent is 19 years old and as a result of this evidence I think that it is reasonable to state that my opponent is trolling.

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 2
DATXDUDE

Pro

Don't vote Con. I h8 him bruh.
Balacafa

Con

Bad conduct as well as spelling and grammar. Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Robert_Weiler// Mod action: NOT Removed<

5 points to Con (Conduct, S&G, Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: Bad attempt at a troll.

[*Reason for non-removal*] We do not moderate troll debates. http://www.debate.org...
************************************************************************
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: EAT_IT_SUKA/ Mod action: NOT Removed<

4 points to Con (S&G, Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Neither side seemed to breach proper conduct. Tie. | Spelling and Grammar: PRO spelled a grand total of 11 words correctly. CON had excellent S&G. Points to CON. | Arguments: PRO had the burden to prove that (s)he wants her truck back. (S)He provided no evidence whatsoever, thus, CON needed not to make arguments. Points to CON. | Sources: No sources used. Tie. Oh, and PRO, troll better next time

[*Reason for non-removal*] We do not moderate troll debates. http://www.debate.org...
************************************************************************
Posted by DATXDUDE 1 year ago
DATXDUDE
How dare you Robert.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Tough 1 year ago
Tough
DATXDUDEBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: The S&G of Pro was so poor that I could only mentally comprehend his round 1 and 3 since 'bruh', 'plz' and 'h8' are common misspellings online but the lowercase i was the only error I could make exception for in his Round 2, the 'habb' and 'bac' were not remotely common misspellings nor easy to decipher. Con was very coherent and made no such errors that hampered my understanding of his arguments. :)
Vote Placed by EAT_IT_SUKA 1 year ago
EAT_IT_SUKA
DATXDUDEBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Neither side seemed to breach proper conduct. Tie. | Spelling and Grammar: PRO spelled a grand total of 11 words correctly. CON had excellent S&G. Points to CON. | Arguments: PRO had the burden to prove that (s)he wants her truck back. (S)He provided no evidence whatsoever, thus, CON needed not to make arguments. Points to CON. | Sources: No sources used. Tie. Oh, and PRO, troll better next time.
Vote Placed by Robert_Weiler 1 year ago
Robert_Weiler
DATXDUDEBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Bad attempt at a troll.