The Instigator
MeAmDumb
Pro (for)
Tied
22 Points
The Contender
MikeyMike
Con (against)
Tied
22 Points

I will be defeated in my debate.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 11 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/22/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,443 times Debate No: 21359
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (10)
Votes (11)

 

MeAmDumb

Pro

I will argue that I will be defeated in here, this debate.

My opponent will prove that I won't be defeated.

First round is for acceptance.
MikeyMike

Con

Let us begin
Debate Round No. 1
MeAmDumb

Pro

the reason i going to lost is because i didnt make enough convincing arguments and my grammar sucks
MikeyMike

Con

garbla goopp. poopy head

ur ugly, and smeeill lyke rectum
Debate Round No. 2
MeAmDumb

Pro

I... well...

idk..
MikeyMike

Con

If a quiz is called a quizicle, what is a test called?
Debate Round No. 3
MeAmDumb

Pro

Chuck Norris's test.
MikeyMike

Con

A Testicle :D
Debate Round No. 4
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by MikeyMike 5 years ago
MikeyMike
lol well this was unfortunate
Posted by MikeyMike 5 years ago
MikeyMike
To everyone who is voting, realize that in order to judge this debate u must look at the arguments put forth. The winner should be who fulfilled their obligation. Neither of us really have to lose in order to win.
Posted by MikeyMike 5 years ago
MikeyMike
Correction, you thought you would be defeated :)
Posted by MeAmDumb 5 years ago
MeAmDumb
I knew I will be defeated.
Posted by MikeyMike 5 years ago
MikeyMike
lol thanx
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
I understand that. I just didn't like it. Now excuse me while I change my vote to counter the votebomb two votes above me.
Posted by MikeyMike 5 years ago
MikeyMike
lol if u look in the vote section u will see why I did what I did.
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
Okay, I go con for one main reason. The specific rhetoric in the resolution implies that a person who's username is 'I' will lose in your debate. 1) Since 'I' did not accept this debate, you cannot defeat him in this debate, thus cannot affirm the resolution. 2) Since a person who's username is 'I' does not exist, it is impossible for you to affirm the resolution.

For those two reasons, the debate automatically goes to con.

But obviously con did not make this argument. If he had, he would have had seven points from me. Since he didn't, and the debate in my opinion was freaking retarted, I gave neither side points.

Cheers. :p
Posted by Oldfrith 5 years ago
Oldfrith
I loved the second round
Posted by TheBrorator 5 years ago
TheBrorator
Impossible debate, it's a paradox. Neither can win while the other succeeds.

For everyone who understands the humor in that: I love you.
11 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Greyparrot 5 years ago
Greyparrot
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: chuck norris...full 7
Vote Placed by Yep 5 years ago
Yep
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: What the heck is this? Seriously...
Vote Placed by ConservativePolitico 5 years ago
ConservativePolitico
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: You neither win nor lose.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Voting Con because Pro is a troll. Also countering Greyparrot.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: He has to lose to win, but if he wins he loses. Therefore he must win to lose via the also resolution. Coubter dust too.
Vote Placed by Neonix 5 years ago
Neonix
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: No points to either side. Poor conduct on both sides. Neither side used spelling worthy of being "better". No arguments where "convincing". No sources where used. If Pro wanted to be defeated, all he had to do is claim forfeiture in the last round.
Vote Placed by FREEDO 5 years ago
FREEDO
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Oooooh, testicles.
Vote Placed by larztheloser 5 years ago
larztheloser
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments was too close to call, but pro did have superior spelling, so he should get the point for that.
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro believed he would lose because of poor grammar and poor arguments, the con then matched that with even worse grammar, jokes, insults, and testicles, making him inferior but technically making him right.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
MeAmDumbMikeyMikeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: RFD in comments. EDIT 2: Re-Countering Greyparrot's VB