The Instigator
Calvincambridge
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
socialpinko
Con (against)
Winning
30 Points

I will contradict myself

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
socialpinko
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/9/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,373 times Debate No: 18693
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (19)
Votes (9)

 

Calvincambridge

Pro

Same rules as I will not contradict myself rules.
socialpinko

Con

1. Are you currently alive?

2. Do you post false information on this site?

3. Do you ever lie when talking to people on this site?

4. Who is posting the answer to this question?

5. Will you contradict yourself in this debate?

6. Are you a liberal in regards to social issues?

7. What is your favorite color?

8. Have you ever spoken to Bertrand Russell in person?

9. Will you win this debate?

10. Have you ever had sexual intercourse with something that is not a human?

11. Do you know that you will go to Heaven after you die?

12. Do you believe that God exists?

These are all the questions I will post in this round.
Debate Round No. 1
Calvincambridge

Pro

yes
some
no
who else me
yes
no
none
who
yes
no and why would I
Yes I accepted Jesus
Yes
socialpinko

Con

I am slightly confused as to the format which Pro has chosen. He has undertaken to contradict himself but has so far employed no evidence to his case. Now if he wishes to show any alleged contradictions in his statements he only has the last round. Perhaps he just didn't contradict himself last round. Oh well, if my opponent does not provide reason why he has contradicted himself he has not fulfilled the onus on him to uphold the resolution. With that said, there is nothing more for me to do but provide my questions for R2.

1. What color is your hair?

2. What color are your eyes?

3. What middle school did you or are you attending?

4. Do you have ten toes?

5. Have you ever had intercourse with a human?

6. What ethnicity are you?

7. What country were you born in?

These are all the questions I wish to post in this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Calvincambridge

Pro

brown
brown
st.Joseph, BVM aka hell and christ academy
yea
nope
none
USA
socialpinko

Con

Due to the different nature of this debate, the onus was on my opponent to show that he had contradicted himself. Seeing as he only answered questions and never outlined a case even after I pointed it out last round one should automatically vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
19 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by socialpinko 2 years ago
socialpinko
oh well I didnt even have a chnce to try
Posted by 000ike 2 years ago
000ike
Hate to rain on your parade Pinko, but, well the contradiction is not statement vs. fact, it is statement v. statement. So even if there is a chance he posted FALSE information, the mere act of writing it makes it subject to contradiction. 2 statements in a row that were contradictory still lends Pro the win.
Posted by socialpinko 2 years ago
socialpinko
My insurance policy was this. I asked him if he ever lied or posted false information. He posted that he sometimes did. Therefore, all I had to do was ask him questions about his personal appearance or background that didn't necessarily relate to each other. He could answer any way to the color of his hair and how many toes he had and still not contradict himself. Therefore, even if the answer didn't make sense, I can simply fall back on the false info question. He never outlined a case though so I never had to.
Posted by Calvincambridge 2 years ago
Calvincambridge
sorry no you dident.
Posted by kohai 2 years ago
kohai
I pretty much let yo win. Lol.
Posted by Calvincambridge 2 years ago
Calvincambridge
I'm trying to honestly answer, @kohai says the one who lost miserably to me.
Posted by kohai 2 years ago
kohai
Man,

Pro is an incompetent idiot...not as much as bozo but needless to say fails.
Posted by Man-is-good 2 years ago
Man-is-good
Is Pro making an effort at all to contradict himself?
Posted by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 2 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
spinko, I'd really like to hear what the insurance policy is after the debate is concluded.
Posted by kohai 2 years ago
kohai
Pro made no case as to whether or not he will contradict himself.
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by kkjnay 2 years ago
kkjnay
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't follow his own rules. Obvious win for Con.
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 2 years ago
BlackVoid
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not contradict himself.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 2 years ago
Maikuru
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I am a bit lost by this one. In any case, Pro claimed he would contradict himself and did not.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 2 years ago
Man-is-good
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Amazing...Pro assigned himself the BOP to prove that he would contradict himself...He never made such an argument, so, as the voter, I have to give socialpinko the win here....
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 2 years ago
Ore_Ele
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: No reason for Pro to lose this other than because, well, it's not nice to say, so I won't say. But he did lose.
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 2 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not even attempt to show where he contradicted himself.
Vote Placed by kohai 2 years ago
kohai
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: There were no contradictions!
Vote Placed by t-man 2 years ago
t-man
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro never pointed out contradictions
Vote Placed by 000ike 2 years ago
000ike
CalvincambridgesocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: All pro had to do was say "I am smart. I am not smart" and he would have won despite Con's tactics. I'm baffled that he didn't bother to deliberately contradict himself. Con wins by default.