I will contradict myself
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
socialpinko
| Started: | 10/9/2011 | Category: | Miscellaneous |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,134 times | Debate No: | 18693 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (19)
Votes (9)
 Con 2. Do you post false information on this site? 3. Do you ever lie when talking to people on this site? 4. Who is posting the answer to this question? 5. Will you contradict yourself in this debate? 6. Are you a liberal in regards to social issues? 7. What is your favorite color? 8. Have you ever spoken to Bertrand Russell in person? 9. Will you win this debate? 10. Have you ever had sexual intercourse with something that is not a human? 11. Do you know that you will go to Heaven after you die? 12. Do you believe that God exists? These are all the questions I will post in this round. |
 |
 Pro yes some no who else me yes no none who yes no and why would I Yes I accepted Jesus Yes Con I am slightly confused as to the format which Pro has chosen. He has undertaken to contradict himself but has so far employed no evidence to his case. Now if he wishes to show any alleged contradictions in his statements he only has the last round. Perhaps he just didn't contradict himself last round. Oh well, if my opponent does not provide reason why he has contradicted himself he has not fulfilled the onus on him to uphold the resolution. With that said, there is nothing more for me to do but provide my questions for R2.
1. What color is your hair? 2. What color are your eyes? 3. What middle school did you or are you attending? 4. Do you have ten toes? 5. Have you ever had intercourse with a human? 6. What ethnicity are you? 7. What country were you born in? These are all the questions I wish to post in this round. |
 |
|
Con Due to the different nature of this debate, the onus was on my opponent to show that he had contradicted himself. Seeing as he only answered questions and never outlined a case even after I pointed it out last round one should automatically vote Con. |
 |
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by kkjnay 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't follow his own rules. Obvious win for Con.
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not contradict himself.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: I am a bit lost by this one. In any case, Pro claimed he would contradict himself and did not.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Amazing...Pro assigned himself the BOP to prove that he would contradict himself...He never made such an argument, so, as the voter, I have to give socialpinko the win here....
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: No reason for Pro to lose this other than because, well, it's not nice to say, so I won't say. But he did lose.
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not even attempt to show where he contradicted himself.
Vote Placed by kohai 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: There were no contradictions!
Vote Placed by t-man 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro never pointed out contradictions
Vote Placed by 000ike 1 year ago
| Calvincambridge | socialpinko | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: All pro had to do was say "I am smart. I am not smart" and he would have won despite Con's tactics. I'm baffled that he didn't bother to deliberately contradict himself. Con wins by default.
Pro is an incompetent idiot...not as much as bozo but needless to say fails.