The Instigator
Cooldudebro
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
DudeStop
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

I will convert you to being a catholic

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
DudeStop
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/21/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 688 times Debate No: 42726
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

Cooldudebro

Pro

First tell me why you are atheist and I will tell you why being a catholic is the Right religion.
DudeStop

Con

Thank you for challenging me to this "debate"

I'm an atheist because I constantly read, watch, and make arguments for atheism. I like Youtube atheists as well, who make fun of the bible.
Debate Round No. 1
Cooldudebro

Pro

First, if the big bang theory is real, how did we get all the elements and living cells. Our surrounding planet does not have even half of the elements we have on earth. An then, who created to planets before earth?
DudeStop

Con

I never said I believed in the Big Bang theory.
Sumultaneous carsation

Multiverse

Why?
Debate Round No. 2
Cooldudebro

Pro

First how did the first cell be created. How can all the elements be created there are too many questions that science can't explain.
DudeStop

Con

I don't know. I'd rather say that than admit that a Skywizard did it without giving any evidence whatsoever. You have failed in proving why a god is the best and/or only explanation for this. You also are failing utterly in proving it is YOUR god who has done this.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com...
You also assumed I thought that I believed in the theories you presented.

This is why you challenged me? To ask two questions?
Debate Round No. 3
Cooldudebro

Pro

Fine meanie.

http://www.ucg.org...

This link proves evolution wrong

http://www.darwinconspiracy.com...

And so does this

And here it proves god exists

http://www.theguardian.com...

I ask people not to vote in this debate. This was just to try to convert him.
DudeStop

Con

I reject his statement and ask people to vote on this debate.

Pro did not put any arguments of his own. He copy and pasted a link, meaning he expects me to go through several articles and dismiss them somehow with only 8,000 characters.

1. Another fallacy, this one being the Bare Assertion that I promote evolution...
2. Poor grammar...
3. Never said a word about how his god was somehow superior...
4. Of the three links, none of them proved that god was real.
5. He challenged me, and failed to even scratch the surface of his burden of proof.

Grammar: "Meanie"
Conduct: "Meanie"... He also committed several bare assertion fallacies.
Arguments: Never proved anything. Only asked questions. Copy and Pasted links refuting evolution, which was not essential to my argument. He made MANY logical fallacies.
And finally, the sources: He said that this source:
http://www.theguardian.com...
Would prove god exists. It was a website regarding evolution. I would not deem that reliable.

Seven Points please.
Debate Round No. 4
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
Ok. Enlighten me!
Posted by nohandlebars 3 years ago
nohandlebars
you guys are both babies and need to be more open minded
Posted by JacobAnderson 3 years ago
JacobAnderson
Pro, your basis is on a scientific theory that you believe to be false, but if you open your eyes, true or false, this theory has more evidence than any belief of Christianity. The reason, some believe, that people are here today and that we all have adapted to our habitats is because of evolution. And if someone is an atheist, you can't just convert them to Catholicism because "How did the Big Bang create us?"
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by dtaylor971 3 years ago
dtaylor971
CooldudebroDudeStopTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: PRO did ask for no votes and con did not have the right to cross that out. Since I can't votebomb and correct the other vote, pro is still losing, but he gains a point for conduct. Plus, con was a little rocky in this discussion.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
CooldudebroDudeStopTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro insulted Con and didn't convert him to Catholicism.