The Instigator
jm_notguilty
Pro (for)
Winning
21 Points
The Contender
wonderwoman
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points

I will not contradict myself

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
jm_notguilty
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/26/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 460 times Debate No: 18473
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (3)
Votes (6)

 

jm_notguilty

Pro

Another one of those spammy and infamous 'I will not contradict myself' debates, I wanted to try one, so here goes.

NOTE: Every person has 1 hour to post in every round, I want to make this quick.

Rules:

1. CON must post 7 questions in teh following rounds, directed at PRO, that can be answerble with yes/no or PRO automatically loses. This does not apply to the final round.

2. PRO must respond to all questions posed by CON in some manner or else PRO loses, I reserve the right not to answer them, when I exercise that right, CON is entitled to post an additional question next round.

4. PRO wins if he is found never to have contradicted himself. Likewise, CON wins if he can prove that PRO has contradicted himself.

5. Only statements made by PRO in rounds 2 and 3 of this debate are subject to be examined for contradiction. No outside sources (profiles, previous debates, etc.) are applicable. Statements made by PRO in this debate not in direct response to any question posed by CON are still applicable.

6. Round 4: no more questions can be asked, it is for final defense of PRO that in the previous rounds he has not contradicted himself and CON to make his/her finale case that PRO in fact did contradict himself.

7. Fofeits are an automatic loss to the person who forfeited.

wonderwoman

Con

Do you like men?
Do you like women?
Are you gay?
Are you bisexual?
Do you like sports?
Do you play fantasy football?
If I asked you out what would you say?
Debate Round No. 1
jm_notguilty

Pro

1. Yes I do, what's not to like? I don't hate them.

2. Yes I do, what's not to like? I don't hate them.

3. No, as a heterosexual male, I am not romantically/sexually attracted to the same sex.

4. No, I already stated my sexual orientation, it is clear that I am not romantically/sexually attracted to both genders.

5. No, I do not like sports that much.

6. No, I do not play fantasy football.

7. I would say no, because I do not know you.
wonderwoman

Con

wonderwoman forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
jm_notguilty

Pro

=(

Well, this is sad.

Persuant to Rule 7, forfeits are an automatic loss, ergo, vote PRO!
wonderwoman

Con

wonderwoman forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
jm_notguilty

Pro

100 puppies get killed every minute, but for every point I get in my votes, I will rescue 5 and give them a home.
wonderwoman

Con

wonderwoman forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by wonderwoman 3 years ago
wonderwoman
1 hour is not long enough to post. My fault for taking the debate.
Posted by jm_notguilty 3 years ago
jm_notguilty
Sorry, just realized it was Q5 he states I contradicted myself, but seriously, that's not a contradiction.
Posted by jm_notguilty 3 years ago
jm_notguilty
Twsurber, I, in no way, contradicted myself, if you're reffering to my answer in Q2, which I answered 'yes' to liking women, then that has no relevance to Q7, liking a human being and not going out on a date with some are two different things, if I say I like women and if you ask if I will have a date with my own mom and I say no, will you say I contradicted myself?

And, nevertheless, persuant to Rule 7, she still loses even if I did contradict myself, which I didn't.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by twsurber 3 years ago
twsurber
jm_notguiltywonderwomanTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro contradicted himself on question 5 by stating no and also not that much meaning some.
Vote Placed by mongeese 3 years ago
mongeese
jm_notguiltywonderwomanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: All forfeits.
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 3 years ago
Ore_Ele
jm_notguiltywonderwomanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: As per the rules of the debate, forfeits are auto losses.
Vote Placed by wiploc 3 years ago
wiploc
jm_notguiltywonderwomanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 3 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
jm_notguiltywonderwomanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by marcuscato 3 years ago
marcuscato
jm_notguiltywonderwomanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: FF