The Instigator
funwiththoughts
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points
The Contender
Natusake
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

I will not contradict myself

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
funwiththoughts
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/25/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 533 times Debate No: 39297
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

funwiththoughts

Pro

In rounds 1-3, Con will ask Pro 10 questions per round. Pro will answer in Rounds 2-4. Con's R4 argument will consist of pointing out wherever he sees the answers contradicting themselves. In R5, Pro will defend himself against Con's accusations, while Con will defend the accusations. The contradictions must be explicit-not inferred. BOP lies on Con, as the resolution is in the negative, meaning Con is the one making a claim.
Natusake

Con

I accept your challenge and wish you good luck, may you be ever so vigilant in your answers to my questions... Let me begin my questioning.

If you will, please do what I ask you do to in my questions, lets keep this social and fun. :)


Questions:

    1. Will you read "Natusake's Information" on my profile?

    1. Are you familiar with the Inheritence Cycle?

    1. Will you tell me why you think I wrote some of the things I did in my profile?

    1. Am I correct in stating that you are from Toronto, Canada?

    1. Will you please take any section in my information, and do a grammar and/or spelling check, then give me the section proper?

    1. What do you think about EA?

    1. Did you know that the requirement of explicit contradictions rather than inferred, makes this much more difficult?

    1. Do you agree that most contradictions in the Bible are inferred?

    1. Am I a vegaterian?

    1. Do I have any pets, and if I do, are they cats?
Debate Round No. 1
funwiththoughts

Pro

"Will you read "Natusake's Information" on my profile?"

I do not know as I cannot read the future. However at the moment I have no intentions of doing such.

"Are you familiar with the Inheritence Cycle?"

I have heard of it, but do not actually know what it is.

"Will you tell me why you think I wrote some of the things I did in my profile?"

I do not know as I cannot read the future. However at the moment I have no intentions of doing such.

"Am I correct in stating that you are from Toronto, Canada?"

Yes.

"Will you please take any section in my information, and do a grammar and/or spelling check, then give me the section proper?"

Once again, I do not know as I cannot read the future. However at the moment I have no intentions of doing such.

"What do you think about EA?"

I rarely think about them.

"Did you know that the requirement of explicit contradictions rather than inferred, makes this much more difficult?"

Surprisingly no, it hadn't crossed my mind.

"Do you agree that most contradictions in the Bible are inferred?"

No.

"Am I a vegaterian?"

There is no such thing as a "vegaterian". If you mean a "vegetarian" then I do not know.

"Do I have any pets, and if I do, are they cats?"

I do not know.

Natusake

Con

Questions:

Will you eat sandwiches?

You will stop sitting when you are finished sitting, correct?

If we knew each other, would you hang out with me?

I suppose you are not going to contradict yourself?

What is your favorite color?

Do you watch Anime?

What is your favorite animal?

What will your career be?

Will you get a good job?

Will you win this debate?
Debate Round No. 2
funwiththoughts

Pro

"Will you eat sandwiches?"

I don't know as I cannot read the future. However, it is likely that I will at some point.

"You will stop sitting when you are finished sitting, correct?"

Assuming that I will at some point be finished sitting, yes.

"If we knew each other, would you hang out with me?"

I do not know enough about you to answer that.

"What is your favorite color?"

Orange.

"Do you watch Anime?"

No.

"What will your career be?"

I do not know, but I would like to be a comedian.

"Will you get a good job?"

I do not know, but I hope so.

"Will you win this debate?"

I do not know, but I hope so.
Natusake

Con

Natusake forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
funwiththoughts

Pro

No questions, no answers.
Natusake

Con

Natusake forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
funwiththoughts

Pro

Since my opponent presented no argument, I win by default.

Vote Pro!
Natusake

Con

Natusake forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by SPENCERJOYAGE14 2 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
funwiththoughtsNatusakeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: FF.
Vote Placed by Raisor 3 years ago
Raisor
funwiththoughtsNatusakeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded and Pro did not contradict himself.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
funwiththoughtsNatusakeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Pretty bad forfeit.