The Instigator
Benshapiro
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Krazzy_Player
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

I will win this debate without any rational reason.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Krazzy_Player
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/11/2014 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 517 times Debate No: 48836
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

Benshapiro

Pro

I just want to show that it's technically possible win a debate without having any rational reason at all. Bacon.
Krazzy_Player

Con

No you can't win any debates without any reason.

Skills required to win debates

1. Topic - A debate should have a valid topic.

2. Arguments - You need to present arguments for any topic you are debating.

3. Refutation - One should rebut or refute arguments made by their opponents and try to expose their opponent weakness in arguments made or which is false presentation.

4. Organisation - One should organise a debate's arguments which make easy for readers and voters to understand and readable path to follow.

5. Conduct - One should have a good conduct. i.e. You should not make any personal attacks on your opponent and should not forfeit debates.

6. Spelling & Grammar - One should have better "Spelling", "Grammar" and "Punctuation" which make a debate well presented and easy to understand.

7. Source - Arguments which is backed by sources shows the research made on a particular debate. Also it serves as an interpretation of evidence.

Conclusion

Since you did not show any of these qualities or skills, it is not possible for you to win neither this nor any debates without having any rational reason.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by BobTheLibertarian 2 years ago
BobTheLibertarian
You had me at Bacon
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 2 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
BenshapiroKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: No coherent arguments by Pro. Coherency and rational arguments by Con. Argument points have to go to Con. Others are tied, its a one round debate after all.
Vote Placed by XLAV 2 years ago
XLAV
BenshapiroKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: You need rational reason to win a debate and con gave rational reasons.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
BenshapiroKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con demonstrated several reasons as to why it's not possible to win a debate without any rational reason.
Vote Placed by oculus_de_logica 2 years ago
oculus_de_logica
BenshapiroKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Bacon is offensive.... But..yeah... maybe you can win without any rational reasoning, but some reasoning would have been nice. a word isn't a reason.