The Instigator
DATXDUDE
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
The_American_Sniper
Con (against)
Winning
27 Points

I win this debate.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
The_American_Sniper
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/13/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 496 times Debate No: 79694
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (6)

 

DATXDUDE

Pro

If anyone accepts this debate, I automatically win.
The_American_Sniper

Con

we can agree that due to the fact that we both accepted the debate, we both lost.

However, you created this debate, and technically accepted before I accepted, meaning that you lost before (and for a longer time) than I did.

To conclude... the only possible outcome would either be a draw, as we both accepted the debate, or loss for Pro , as he lost for a longer amount of time than I did.
Debate Round No. 1
DATXDUDE

Pro

No, I created this debate, and you accepted it. I win.
The_American_Sniper

Con

You accepted to complete the debate. I only accepted the challenge of the debate. Since you accepted longer, you lost.
Debate Round No. 2
DATXDUDE

Pro

kk f'aggot.
The_American_Sniper

Con

So my opponent called me a faggot, which I'm clearly not. Loss of conduct and spelling, because kk is not a real word.

Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Richardsonalj 1 year ago
Richardsonalj
DATXDUDEThe_American_SniperTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: The_American_Sniper is already winning, which means DATXDUDE loses by default. And his use of f*aggot was unnecesary. Win goes to Con.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
DATXDUDEThe_American_SniperTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: pro insulted con and gave up
Vote Placed by Balacafa 1 year ago
Balacafa
DATXDUDEThe_American_SniperTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con countered all arguments made by Pro by stating that acceptance isn't necessarily just stating that you accept the debate, it also requires acceptance to create the debate. I was inclined to give spelling and grammar to Pro as I was beginning to read the debate due to the fact that there were capitalization errors with Con's argument. However Pro ruined their chances of getting a point due to the complete mess up of grammar in the final round. Conduct clearly goes to Con due to the fact that Pro called Con a f*ggot and they essentially forfeited all rounds because they provided either no arguments or extremely weak arguments in the round. No sources were used so that's a tie.
Vote Placed by William.Burnham 1 year ago
William.Burnham
DATXDUDEThe_American_SniperTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: All points to con. Pro, that language is unacceptable, go back to the drawing board and sharpen your mind before your tougne.
Vote Placed by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
DATXDUDEThe_American_SniperTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: The faggot comment at the end was bad conduct
Vote Placed by asi14 1 year ago
asi14
DATXDUDEThe_American_SniperTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct/Spelling to the con because of Pro's profanity and lack of knowledge "kk" isn't a real word. Convincing arguments to the con, the pro just extended his main claim that anyone who accepts loses. He doesn't attack con's claims directly. Either way, this debate sucked. Pro, why would you even launch this debate?