The Instigator
Flyinglow
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
crackofdawn_Jr
Con (against)
Winning
54 Points

I would beat your up

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/19/2009 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 3,317 times Debate No: 9743
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (10)

 

Flyinglow

Pro

I would be able to beat you up.
crackofdawn_Jr

Con

My opponent claims that "I would be able to beat you [me] up."

I assume by taking this debate that you mean to physically beat me up. If not, please specify how you could beat me up in the next round and do not count this round against me.

beat up- to strike violently or forcefully and repeatedly.
(http://dictionary.reference.com...)

For this to happen, a couple of requirements must be met:

1. She must know where to find me.
If she does not know where I am, she can't beat me up.

2. She must be able to get to me.
If she knows where I am, but can't physically reach me, she cannot beat me up. As my opponent lives in Venezuela, not only would it be hard for her to find me, but it is also unlikely that she could get to me.

3. She must be able to physically harm me.
If she is not physically strong or mobile enough to harm me, then she can not beat me up.

4. She must be able to get past any defenses of mine to harm me.
Defenses can range from anything from my own ability to fight back, to people around me who would help me out, or to our widely spread out geographic locations that would make it hard for her to reach me. Since she is a 99 year-old female there is no way she would have the physically strength and mobility to beat me up.

5. She must be able to continually harm me, not a one-shot sucker-punch.
If all the first 4 requirements are met she still must be able to continually beat me down. It can't be a one-shot thing and she must have the stamina to make the beating last. It is unlikely she does as, once again, she is a 99 year-old woman from Venezuela.

6. She has to be able to catch me.
I could simply choose to run away at the sight of her and avoid being in physical contact with her.

I await my opponent's response.
Debate Round No. 1
Flyinglow

Pro

Thank your for the timely response, this should be a fun debate.

Con's points

1. The resolution says I will beat you up, so this assumes the fact that we are face to face.

2. I am extremely rich, I will go to you on my private jet, and fly to where you live, look you up on the internet, and go to your house and affirm the resolution.
Here is a picture of my private jet. http://www.blavish.com...

Here is a picture of the inside. http://universeofluxury.com...

3. My opponent assumes that I would not be able to physically harm him, that is a laugh.
I drink 5 protein shakes a day, and I lift also. Here is a picture of me. http://www.yousaytoo.com...

Here is a picture of my opponent. http://www.debate.org...

If you look at my opponent, he is much smaller, and I would be able to affirm the resolution.

4. My opponent states that I am 99, and would nt be able to fight. Well many people put false information of their profile, which I did. If you look at logical master's profile, it says he is 100 years old. I highly doubt he is 100. As I said I have a private jet, I would get to you. Also who would help you? Teenagers? That's no match for me.

5. Look to my attack on point 4.
crackofdawn_Jr

Con

I would like to thank my opponent for his quick and timely response.

<<1. The resolution says I will beat you up, so this assumes the fact that we are face to face.>>

Agreed.

<<2. I am extremely rich, I will go to you on my private jet, and fly to where you live, look you up on the internet, and go to your house and affirm the resolution.
Here is a picture of my private jet. http://www.blavish.com...;

This statement relies on the fact that you:
A. Truthful
You said,"Well many people put false information of their profile, which I did.", so it is obvious that you are not truthful. This means that anything you say cannot be held as true unless proven so.

B. Able to find me on the internet
Go ahead and look for me on the internet, you will not find me. You may know my city but there are hundreds of thousands of people living in this city and you will not be able to find my specific address. If you can't find me, you can't beat me up.

You also claim that this link, http://www.blavish.com......, is your private jet. I find this extremely unlikely because:
A. It is the first picture to come up on google images when you type in "private jet" (http://images.google.com...)
B. The interior of "your jet" is the fourth picture to come up on google images when you type in "private jet" (http://images.google.com...)

If you look even closer you realize that the two pictures are of two different jets. Also, the pictures are of private jets which can be rented out from two differen companies at two different prices.

3. Once again, we cannot tell if you're telling the truth. Not only is that women obviously not 99, she is also a man judging by the bulge in the bikini. All you did this time was go on google and type "buff women" and choose the second result. (http://images.google.com...)

<>

That picture was taken almost 2 years ago and I have grown much then and worked out a lot. I am not the same person and so I am sure I would adequately be able to defend myself.

4. This is just proof that you are a liar.
<>
How do you know they are no match for you? I have many friends, and we could easily overwhelm you. Many of them are in sports as well. Not to mention the fact that there's teachers, janitors, and adults around everywhere in my life. To top it off police officers patrol my school and there's only one way in which is guarded by a police officer which won't allow you access unless you're a parent or school employee.

5. Look to point 4.

6. You did not refute this point and so you concede it.

::CONCLUSION::
My opponent bases everything off pictures from google which mysteriously come up on the front page when generic terms are typed in. He didn't even take care to check that the two planes were the same one which he claims is his and he also calls himself a liar. He cannot find me and even if he did he couldn't hurt me because of the support of the masses around me.

I await your response.
Debate Round No. 2
Flyinglow

Pro

Point 1: Putting misleading information on my profile does not mean I am a perpetual lier, it just means that I don't want people to know my information.

B. I will be able to look you up very easily, since your name is on your profile, I look at your name, location, and it is very easy to find you.

Just because it's on the front page on Google images, does not mean they are not mine.

Again that could be me, and I am not 99.

It doesn't matter how much you work out, I would still beat you, if you simply look at the picture of me.

I wouldn't go to your school to beat you up, I would go to your house, and it would be a surprise.

Also your probably do debate, and many debaters are nerds.
crackofdawn_Jr

Con

<>

It means you're a liar, i.e., someone who doesn't tell the truth. A liar can never be trusted so anything you say can not be handled accountable.

<>

Actually, my profile only goes down to my city which has hundreds of thousands of people living in it. I seriously doubt you could find me in it.

<>

Not just that but the fact that I found them using generic search terms any person could type in looking for an easy picture of a "private jet" and the fact that they're different planes does prove it.

<>

I would like to turn attention to the word "could". No one says "It could be me" they say "That's me". Once again, you are a liar who can't be trusted and not only that, it's impossible to keep that much muscle mass at the age of 99 or if you're a woman.

<>

A. Not your picture
B. You don't know how big I am

<>

A. You don't know where I live
B. Even if you did, I'd either not be alone or have the doors locked

<>

I don't have enough space on my schedule to do debate. By that definition, you are also a nerd, as you are debating me right now. So if I can't be that big, by your logic, than you can't be that big.

::CONCLUSION::

My opponent bases his claim of a bunch of "ifs" that I have proven he can't accomplish. He has continually lied and I have given plenty of circumstantial evidence to prove that he is wrong.

P.S. I'm sorry I couldn't post a link for the woman's muscle mass fact. My internet is messed up right now and I don't even know how I'm on this website right now. I'll post my link in the comment section later for those of you who are interested.

Thank you for a great debate.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by philosphical 7 years ago
philosphical
lol
this debate = total pwnage
Posted by crackofdawn_Jr 7 years ago
crackofdawn_Jr
I saw that, and the word "would", but I didn't want nor need to make this a semantical debate.
Posted by Kleptin 7 years ago
Kleptin
"I do not have an up"

/debate
Posted by crackofdawn_Jr 7 years ago
crackofdawn_Jr
Still messed up so I'll just say it has to do with testosterone which helps men build muscle while true women produce estrogen (some women actually have male parts and are considered both sexes, not just women). Also, women are believed to be born with fewer muscle fibers then men which would severely hurt there chances of ever getting buff.
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
If acer joins in, he's got a black-belt friend as well.
Posted by philosphical 7 years ago
philosphical
im loving it haha
Posted by mongoose 7 years ago
mongoose
He's got black-stripe friends.
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Equinox 7 years ago
Equinox
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by philosphical 7 years ago
philosphical
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Nails 7 years ago
Nails
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 7 years ago
Logical-Master
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by aoibhinn 7 years ago
aoibhinn
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by skull95w 7 years ago
skull95w
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Maikuru 7 years ago
Maikuru
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by oceanix 7 years ago
oceanix
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by crackofdawn_Jr 7 years ago
crackofdawn_Jr
Flyinglowcrackofdawn_JrTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06