The Instigator
LightStar
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Cermank
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points

IPL should be banned. Yes/No

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Cermank
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/22/2013 Category: Sports
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 7,485 times Debate No: 34031
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

LightStar

Con

IPL should not be banned. It is very good and entertaining.
Cermank

Pro

For people who don’t know what IPL is,its club cricket.

1. Cricket,being the absolutely amazing game as it is,is entertaining because of its novelty.Introducing IPLs just borders on ‘too much cricket’,if theres a thing like that.

2. With all the match fixing scandals around it,its no longer unpredictable.Its merely a show.

3.GOOD?The players are freaking exhausted,playing all year round.We lost to Pakistan last time.Its the deriliction of national duty right there.

Its neither good,nor entertaining.

Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Cermank 3 years ago
Cermank
Had to snip it from 1800 characters to 500 characters. It lost a lot of its appeal on the way. :/

IPL: Indian Premium League. An international league for Twenty twenty cricket.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by SaintMichael741 3 years ago
SaintMichael741
LightStarCermankTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Needs to be longer. Lightstar should have made more rounds in order to prove his point. Borderline waste of space of a debate.
Vote Placed by wrichcirw 3 years ago
wrichcirw
LightStarCermankTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: zzz...no debate, no arguments from CON. Nice noob sniping, PRO. :)
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 3 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
LightStarCermankTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Only Pro made any arguments. It would have been interesting to see a fully-fleshed out debate.