The Instigator
Pazza
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
prorobotics
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

ISIS is a government funded false-flag organisation

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
prorobotics
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/16/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 377 times Debate No: 83986
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

Pazza

Pro

ISIS, ISIL or Daesh are a false flag organisation, it has been said by Vladimir Putin that Turkey, a member of NATO is funding the terror group to fulfil western political interests. But it doesn't end there, ISIS have been seen often with western military equipment, stingers, brand new shiny Toyota pick-ups, technology that can be supplied only by a capable nation's arms trade. This is no doubt allocated through the gulf states that are also funding and facilitating ISIS's sale of oil, this can be prevented easily by sanctions, but they are not being stopped as Arabia is too valuable an asset to give up.
The west 'responds' to their staged, false-flag events (Charlie Hebdo, Paris attacks) that makes blind violence a popular opinion in social media despite there being other attacks in less well-off countries, the bombing runs are executed with great imbecility against ISIS targets as opposed to simply cutting-off their supply lines, which should be an obvious course of action, instead the West uptakes direct action to cover-up the fact that ISIS is supplied by them. In the process of doing this, the west are purposely feeding a Jihadi ideology and rekindling the crusade dilemma that has cursed the middle east for generations, it's counter-intuitive to do this and implies that the West want war as it is profitable, it puts Israel in power in the middle east and it gives the USA access to oil as well as eliminating Bashar Al-Assad, who is Russia's sole main ally in the region. It also drives multiculturalism into the Western world which creates a power vacuum in the middle east, creates isolated, parallel societies and the terrorism puts enmity between people - it boosts the controllable slavery in the serfdom of the west.
This is not helped by the fact the Zionist USA is legislating Israel's bombing runs of neighbouring Syria and Palestine and driving out their native populaces, then duping these people to believe they are the 'saviours' of these people, when the main stir-up was instigated by their bombs, their Israel and their ISIS. It's all a power-grab and you know it.
prorobotics

Con

ISIS is not government funded, it is AGAINST Bathar al Assad
Debate Round No. 1
Pazza

Pro

Pazza forfeited this round.
prorobotics

Con

ISIS HAS a flag and IS an organization AND is against Bashar al Assad, so why are you saying that its government funded and doesn't have a flag? Huh? Am I right or am I right
Debate Round No. 2
Pazza

Pro

Pazza forfeited this round.
prorobotics

Con

ISIS is not government funded as I said, after all, most countries (including Muslim countries) opposes ISIS' actions. Their cruelty towards other religions has caused hatred by many global powers.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by TripDebates 1 year ago
TripDebates
Saying that ISIS is fake and from the US is a insult to everybody who has lost family/friends. You sir, are either doing a terrible joke, or have lived under a rock.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by TheResistance 1 year ago
TheResistance
PazzaproroboticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF by Pro
Vote Placed by William.Burnham 1 year ago
William.Burnham
PazzaproroboticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Points to con for pro's forfeit. It's a shame, I would have liked to see how this would've played out.
Vote Placed by retroz 1 year ago
retroz
PazzaproroboticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeiture