The Instigator
cybr-ninja
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
Controverter
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

If America split in two again would South win this time

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Controverter
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/14/2013 Category: Economics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 889 times Debate No: 32466
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

cybr-ninja

Pro

if all the military split and went back home, and America split North and South would the South beat the states up North who don't believe in the 2nd amendment as much. All of the military resources split in two also.
Controverter

Con

All of the Military are based in Northern USA as well as Washington DC itself is in North USA.
Debate Round No. 1
cybr-ninja

Pro

Much of the military volunteers are from the South, and they wouldn't fight against the South if they are from it. The South has Fort Benning, home of the military, and Texas has the most military contracts in America. In addition The South has Southern pride, the love of the 2nd amendment.
Controverter

Con

There are more illegal gangs in the South, gangs hate each other, they'd have a civil war.
Debate Round No. 2
cybr-ninja

Pro

The Southern government would be better than the Northern government, because the South is mainly republican, compared to the North. The gangs could be the first things to go. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention about all the air force bases in the South especially Florida.
Controverter

Con

The North would shoot heat seeking missiles at your aircraft and then would use their supreme military force to murder you.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by hotrod73 3 years ago
hotrod73
yes but if the north and south split like they did during the civil war the south would have the b-2 stealth bombers on thier side.
Posted by William.Burnham 3 years ago
William.Burnham
I'm beginning to see a pattern in all these debates you post...
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by lindseyloo92 3 years ago
lindseyloo92
cybr-ninjaControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: cybr-ninja seems like a racist.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
cybr-ninjaControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: While I agree that the fallacy was unnecessary, Pro did provide more logical arguments putting that aside (i.e., Texas's military strength v. gangs hate each other).
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
cybr-ninjaControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: A little torn, but Argument goes to Con. Pro stated "Southern government would be better than the Northern government, because the South is mainly republican," which is a bit of a fallacy. If one political party is better than another is not the debate, but if wars would be decided by such a small fact is a definite no.