If a god exists, it is impossible for him to care about the human race.
Debate Rounds (3)
1. If God care about the human race, why does he let evil happen?
He wants to give them a chance to do the right thing by themselves
Any more statements? I don't know, please send some over!
these are all peer reviewed studies by scores of world renowned scientists supporting my claim. Also if a being exists outside of time, then a beings death or well being literally could not matter as the person would be alive at some point, as death would not even be a concept he would be worried about, as someone would always be alive and dead in the eyes of god.
I am not suggesting time travel, I am suggesting an all knowing being would know whether or not you would do something, and that he could prevent harm coming to the victim while still allowing the perpertrator to do the action, thus not impeding his "free will."
"It would be like us being concerned with a couple microbes"
I would like to point out that NASA funded billions to have microbes brought to the moon, then time magazine published an entire article about them, and how they survived the moon, it's not too far off actually.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by roguetech 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||6||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made the argument that a god with traits that are impossible would have no reason to care. Although the argument is easily rebutted, Con failed to so. Therefore Pro was more convincing. Con makes several absurdly false claims regarding C14 dating that even Answers In Genesis wouldn't attempt, so I give Con a loss on conduct for lying. Sources is being awarded because Pro had better quality sources. Con had so few sources (none) that it constituted inadequate source support. Pro had sources of superior quality.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.