The Instigator
surpy
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
PeacefulChaos
Con (against)
Winning
48 Points

If you accept the challenge then I win, if you don't then I lose.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
PeacefulChaos
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/20/2012 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,353 times Debate No: 21321
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (5)
Votes (10)

 

surpy

Pro

The rules is in the topic title. If you accept the challenge to this debate, then I automatically win no matter what, if no one accepts the challenge to this debate then I automatically lose. It is your choice!

Oh! Did I mention that if you accept the challenge to this debate then you get a free cookie! :D
PeacefulChaos

Con

I would like to remind voters that this is what my opponent has said, "If you accept the challenge to this debate, then I automatically win no matter what, if no one accepts the challenge to this debate then I automatically lose."

Please note the part that I have underlined. I would like to point out that the DDO user named, "you" has not accepted the challenge to this debate, which means my opponent does NOT win.

Here is proof that there is someone named "you" on DDO: http://www.debate.org...

If no one had accepted this debate (there is not a DDO user named no one), then my opponent would not have won or lost, since the debate would have been canceled.

Both rules have been rendered moot; therefore, I should win. If voters find that no one has fulfilled their actual BOP, then I urge voters to notice how I am the only one who has provided a source for this debate.

Thank you.

Debate Round No. 1
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by PeacefulChaos 4 years ago
PeacefulChaos
It's his fault for not being grammatically correct, not mine, lol.
Posted by kyro90 4 years ago
kyro90
Actually look at what the name of this debate says....
If you accept the challenge then I win, if you don't then I lose.

So if you actually put a real persons name in "You" it would be gramatically incorrect.
Posted by PeacefulChaos 4 years ago
PeacefulChaos
Thanks, guys :D
Posted by kyro90 5 years ago
kyro90
Lol, you should have accepted it, but that was hilarious how there really was someone named "you".
Posted by MikeyMike 5 years ago
MikeyMike
loool
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Yep 4 years ago
Yep
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: You where are you? Oh wait, he's not in the round? Aww guess PeacefulChaos wins, I'm giving conduct to Con because of Pro's horrible attempt at getting a free win. Also As pointed out by con, Sources were cons alone, And no pro, i don't want that troll faced cookie sorry i prefer chocolate chip
Vote Placed by renji_abarai 4 years ago
renji_abarai
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious win per the title of this debate
Vote Placed by Multi_Pyrocytophage 4 years ago
Multi_Pyrocytophage
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Kudos to Con. It is impossible to not v-bomb this.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Llol
Vote Placed by Beachgirly 4 years ago
Beachgirly
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I bet Pro feels just a tad moded.. Good Job Con!!
Vote Placed by 16kadams 4 years ago
16kadams
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: He accepted it
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Another ridiculus un-debate put down. Well done PeacefulChaos.
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: very well done con, i couldnt have done it better myself
Vote Placed by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Dayum. Well played. Since 'you' didn't take the debate, pro therefore cannot win. Thus, con wins.
Vote Placed by Zealotical 5 years ago
Zealotical
surpyPeacefulChaosTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Personal Opinion