The Instigator
J03ybatts
Pro (for)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
ricksterpr0
Con (against)
Winning
28 Points

If you accept this debate, you lose.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
ricksterpr0
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/4/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 553 times Debate No: 59965
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (7)
Votes (7)

 

J03ybatts

Pro

By accepting this debate, con is admitting that he has forfeited the debate and wishes voters to vote for the user JO3ybatts for all categories in this debate. He also agrees that will abide by the following rules,.
The rules:

1. No semantics

2. In round 1, the contender may only say " I forfeit this debate. Vote for Pro"

3 Forfeiting results in all points going to pro.

4. If any of the previous rules are broken, the contender automatically forfeits the debate

Voting Criteria:

If Con does not say "I forfeit this debate. Vote for Pro" or he includes other words with this phrase, all points must be awarded to Pro.

If Con accepts this debate, he forfeits and all points must go to pro.

Only accept if you wish to let me win.
ricksterpr0

Con

I forfeit this debate. [ I am still able to argue within this quotation. Pro said I could not post anything with this, but he did not exclude the possibilities with the quotation. I win, I did not forfeit. Do the opposite of what I say after this :) ] Vote for Pro
Debate Round No. 1
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Firelife 3 years ago
Firelife
Nah you gotta hand it to rick pro was attempting to get an easy win. Looks like its gonna be a loss XD
Posted by evangambit 3 years ago
evangambit
AlexanderOC, I believe everything you posted is fairly true, though I think it is an excellent example of the community rising above the strict to-the-letter rules and interpreting their intent as it strives to become better. A community that rewards these kinds of debates isn't really a good one for fostering the kind of discussion that the creators of this site intended.
Posted by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
Alexander, the instigator of the debate doesn't get to choose what criteria we use for judging.

Pro had the BOP and failed to offer any premises whatsoever. He lost because he didn't argue. Conduct is a huge issue as well. Attempting to dictate every word your opponent writes is bad sportsmanship.

Also Fuzzy is literally the worst voter ever.
Posted by AlexanderOc 3 years ago
AlexanderOc
Prime example of biased voted. Con accepted an therefore forfeited by order of the rules. The only reason he is winning is because people don't like Pro for being cheap.
Posted by ricksterpr0 3 years ago
ricksterpr0
Calm down. This should not be so unsettling.
Posted by J03ybatts 3 years ago
J03ybatts
**** off you prick using semantics if ****ing banned
Posted by J03ybatts 3 years ago
J03ybatts
wow f*** con. that is cheap and unfair. still vote pro
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by rings48 3 years ago
rings48
J03ybattsricksterpr0Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con came up with a creative was to say Vote Con. Pro didnt even say vote pro....
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
J03ybattsricksterpr0Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was correct.
Vote Placed by Codedlogic 3 years ago
Codedlogic
J03ybattsricksterpr0Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had more convincing arguments and followed all the established rules.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
J03ybattsricksterpr0Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Stupid unfair resolution.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 3 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
J03ybattsricksterpr0Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited.
Vote Placed by YaHey 3 years ago
YaHey
J03ybattsricksterpr0Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Poor attempt at a free win. Con listened to the rules but creatively managed a way to conduct his own arguments. Obvious win for Con.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
J03ybattsricksterpr0Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: There was absolutely no reason for pro to create this debate; lame free-win. Con deserves point for creativity as well as ability to stay calm while pro swore in the comment section. This was a dumb debate anyways.