The Instigator
GoogooGaga
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points
The Contender
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

I'm Pro and you are Noob

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
GoogooGaga
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/12/2016 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 566 times Debate No: 95353
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (9)
Votes (1)

 

GoogooGaga

Con

Accept immediately to debate this.

Definitions

Pro: Proposition
Noob: Contender
vi_spex

Pro

you are contender on this proposition, therfore i defeat your claim
Debate Round No. 1
GoogooGaga

Con

In a debate, the speaker doesn't convince the opponent, they convince the audience/judge/voters of the resolution being true or false.

When Pro uses 'you' he is talking to you, the reader, not me. You are not the contender in this debate.

;
vi_spex

Pro

right i am pro.. your claim is defeated by my position
Debate Round No. 2
GoogooGaga

Con

And: conjunction
1.
(used to connect grammatically coordinate words,phrases, or clauses) along or together with; aswell as; in addition to; besides; also; moreover:
http://www.dictionary.com...

There is no way Pro can win this debate without proving that you are not Noob and I'm sorry to tell you that you, the audience, are not Noob. You are not contenders in this debate.
vi_spex

Pro

you have no idea how to debate or when you have simply lost
Debate Round No. 3
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
Like I said.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Shamoo2// Mod action: Removed<

4 points to Con (Conduct, Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: Con was able to prove that he is Pro while con show nothing to prove he was not a noob.

[*Reason for removal*] (1) The voter doesn't explain conduct. (2) Arguments are insufficiently explained. The voter is required to specifically analyze arguments made by both debaters, and in this case appears to just give the perceived outcome of those points.
************************************************************************
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
I can have votes removed too.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: dsjpk5// Mod action: Removed<

4 points to Pro (Conduct, Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: This is clearly a troll debate, and as such, not moderated. With this in mind, my rfd is irrelevant. I vote Pro because that diaper has a turd in it.

[*Reason for removal*] It is unclear whether or not this is a troll debate, both from a cursory read and from the instigator"s own views. In cases like this where the status of the debate is uncertain, vote moderation treats the debate as a non-troll debate. As such, the RFD is indeed relevant, and the voter is required to provide one if they wish to vote.
************************************************************************
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
sry about the last round, this is confusing..
Posted by GoogooGaga 1 year ago
GoogooGaga
I'm not saying I'm pro though :) I'm against it.
Posted by BackCommander 1 year ago
BackCommander
"When Pro uses 'you' he is talking to you, the reader, not me.."
No Pro is very obviously referring to you, Con, not us.
They are Pro in this debate and you failed to define Pro, so their argument stands that because they are Pro it is obvious that you can't be.
Posted by GoogooGaga 1 year ago
GoogooGaga
Quick accept it
Posted by ThinkBig 1 year ago
ThinkBig
This debate makes no sense. What's the resolution?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 12 months ago
9spaceking
GoogooGagavi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: eh. not fair, but pro didn't really... use any sources