The Instigator
imabench
Pro (for)
Winning
35 Points
The Contender
19debater19
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Imabench's 499th debate: The Chinese government is retarded.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
imabench
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/10/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 900 times Debate No: 42073
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (8)

 

imabench

Pro

As my 499th debate ever on DDO, I shall argue that the Chinese government is completely retarded. I will argue that the chinese government IS retarded, con will argue that it is not.

My sole evidence for why I believe the Chinese government is retarded will come from China's response to people about why SMOG IS A GOOD THING

For those of you who dont know, China has a smog problem, a BIG one. Its so bad that people can literally chew on the air and schools regularly close because the smog is too thick to see. Many people have complained that China has to do something about the smog, and in response, the Chinese government listed 5 reasons why Smog is GOOD:

These are the following reasons the Chinese Government actually gave for why Smog is a good thing: http://news.yahoo.com...

1. It unifies the Chinese people.
2. It makes China more equal.
3. It raises citizen awareness of the cost of China’s economic development.
4. It makes people funnier.
5. It makes people more knowledgeable

Again, this is all completely real, and it is what the Chinese government actually said about why people should think smog is a GOOD thing....

Even I cant make this sh** up.... And since this actually happened and isnt a prank, I shall argue that the Chinese government is indeed retarded..... Not North Korea level retarded, but still pretty damn retarded.

First round is not acceptance only.
19debater19

Con

I F*CKING HATE YOU IMA ACCEPT MY F*CKING DEBATE CHALLENGE YOU M*THERF*CKER
Debate Round No. 1
imabench

Pro

How about that.... The retarded Chinese government hired their top retard to accept this debate and defend their actions......

Im honored at the chance to get a free win so easy ;D

As for my argument..... Well the evidence pretty much speaks for itself .... I mean smog most certainly does not make people funnier, it does not make them more intelligent, it does not make the Chinese people more equal or united, and it is in fact horrendously unhealthy for you and your health:

http://bodyandhealth.canada.com...
http://www.lung.ca...
http://library.thinkquest.org...
http://www.webmd.com...
http://www.airnow.gov...

Thats all I got for now, I will now allow my retarded opponent to give any arguments he can put together

:)
19debater19

Con

YOUR A RETARD STALIN ROCKS YOU SUCK YOU NEVER SHOULDVE VOTEBOMBED
Debate Round No. 2
imabench

Pro

If I suck then how come your the one who is going to forfeit the last round of this debate?
19debater19

Con

19debater19 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
so *could you*
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Roy I really dont want to end up putting something else you say on the weekly stupid so please sh** on Obamacare somewhere else? this is a troll debate after all....
Posted by RoyLatham 3 years ago
RoyLatham
Is the Chinese government now working on the justification for Obamacare? Seems so.
Posted by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
lol @ Round 1
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
"Dickface"

remember: STALIN.

This post is retarded.
Thank you stalin.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
Yes Imabench.

When trying to figure if something is retarded, Ask your self: Would Stalin:
Say this?
Think this?
Assert this?
Like this?
Indite this?
Note it down in his diary of things he wish he had said first?

Then it is retarded.

Remember, STALIN whenever you're wondering if it's downright retarded or not kids!

Let's take an example:

"Imabench's a traitor"

Remember STALIN.

If we look at the list above, we can see that several if them fit in.

Now try one by yourself:
"I should be the dictator"
Go ahead and see if it matches up!
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Retarded is defined as anything that Stalin would think is true and reasonable
Posted by bsh1 3 years ago
bsh1
Define retarded. Depending on the def, I may take this up. My first troll debate...
Posted by TN05 3 years ago
TN05
I'm really tempted to debate this...
Posted by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
I don't think the Chinese government could possibly be as retarded as Imabench is.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: What the heck is this? No arguments, used insults, and forfeited. He failed in good grammar = a loss. Wow. Just wow. This is a new level of lame.
Vote Placed by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Was this even a debate?
Vote Placed by dtaylor971 3 years ago
dtaylor971
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Wow... Due to forfeit, IMA wins.
Vote Placed by Greematthew 3 years ago
Greematthew
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: What
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Con never refuted pro, and showed awful conduct.
Vote Placed by miketheman1200 3 years ago
miketheman1200
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Was that real?
Vote Placed by jh1234l 3 years ago
jh1234l
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con never argued anything and forfeited.
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 3 years ago
RoyLatham
imabench19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made no arguments, used insults, and forfeited. He also failed to use punctuation, thus completing the coveted four-way-loss.