The Instigator
Matt_U
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheTraditionalist
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points

Immigration Laws

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
TheTraditionalist
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/18/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,052 times Debate No: 28404
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Matt_U

Con

The immigration laws present a challenge- with our current laws terrorists could easily access this nation.

Rules:

1- Positive Comments Only
2- Have Fun!
TheTraditionalist

Pro

There are major problems with United States immigration laws that would make it possible for terrorists to access this country:

Seeing as I only have a half an hour to respond, I will try to be speedy and precise.

Any time you are letting people into your country, there is an inherent risk that they some of those immigrants may have a malicious intent. The only way that the United States could mitigate this is if they simply prevented all immigration and travel to the United States, but this solution wouldn't even begin to address the problems of domestic terrorism.
Debate Round No. 1
Matt_U

Con

Matt_U forfeited this round.
TheTraditionalist

Pro

Alas, he is the victim of his own time restraints.
Debate Round No. 2
Matt_U

Con

we dont have to cut off imigration all together, but we must be aware of who enters. there should be more to crossing the border than showing an id.
TheTraditionalist

Pro

You do realize that you are against the resolution that "The immigration laws present a challenge- with our current laws terrorists could easily access this nation," correct?
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Chicken 4 years ago
Chicken
Matt_UTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: No rfd needed for such a stupid debate.