The Instigator
twsurber
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Crayzman2297
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Impromptu 8

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/2/2010 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 722 times Debate No: 12207
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

twsurber

Pro

Your round 1 choices:

A) Wooden bats should be used at all levels of baseball
B) Unsaved people will go to the lake of fire
C) Special interest groups are ruining America

Choose 1 and argue either side in round 2, leave me 3 choices to argue in round 2
Crayzman2297

Con

B) Unsaved people will NOT go to the lake of fire.
By "unsaved" i am assuming you are reffering to those who have not been saved by Christ. (Salvation is more or less an exclusive christian thing) And I maintain that, being there no proof that Christianity has any more claim to people's souls than any other religion, It is entirely possible that the "unsaved" (such as myself) will rot in the Jewish Purgatory. Or be reincarnated as a chicken, as in the Hindu belief.
There is no concrete evidence to support your claim nor mine, so because you cannot change my own beliefs and I cannot change yours, this particular arguement has no other option other than to end in a tie.
Next?
Debate Round No. 1
twsurber

Pro

Choose 1 and argue either side in round 2, leave me 3 choices to argue in round 2

Crazyman, You did not leave me 3 choices like you were supposed to. Judges disregard this impromptu.
Crayzman2297

Con

Crayzman2297 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Crayzman2297 6 years ago
Crayzman2297
Yea sorry.... i didn't understand what you were saying. Resetting would be good. Just make sure you challenge me.
Posted by twsurber 6 years ago
twsurber
Crazyman, Thanks for your input, but you were supposed to present your case in round 2.

You were supposed to leave me my 3 choices in round 1. We can reset it if you want.
Posted by mongeese 6 years ago
mongeese
So, wait, when do we actually argue against each other?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
twsurberCrayzman2297Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit, rule violation.
Vote Placed by Crayzman2297 6 years ago
Crayzman2297
twsurberCrayzman2297Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00