The Instigator
monkeydude99
Pro (for)
Winning
48 Points
The Contender
boxxybabee
Con (against)
Losing
40 Points

In MW2 the ACR is much better than the Tar 21, and the Ac130 is better than the Chopper Gunner

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/29/2009 Category: Technology
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 10,180 times Debate No: 10270
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (13)

 

monkeydude99

Pro

As clearly stated in the title, i want tot debate 2 things about Mw2. i want to debate 2 of the guns and two of the killstreak rewards. My arguments are:
1. The ACR is better than the Tar 21 for many reasons. The ACR has FAR less Recoil. Therefore your shots are more accurate. The ACR is unlocked at a higher level than the Tar-21 (ACR unlocked at 48-Tar-21 unlocked at 20) therefore showing that the game developer Infinity Ward also believes that the ACR is a better weapon.
2. The Chopper Gunner is worse than the Ac130. This is also for many reasons. First let me make it clear that both killstreaks are unlocked after getting an 11 killstreak (10 with hardline). When piloting the chopper gunner, you are very low to the ground in most cases. So when playing maps such as Skidrow often times your vision is blocked by towering buildings or corners of buildings. Thus minimizing the amount of kills you may get when operating the vehicle. Another large problem that occurs with the Chopper Gunner is the movement involved when shooting its guns. The Ac130 is virtually still when its guns are being fired. This is quite the contrary for the Chopper Gunner, for when you shoot it has notable recoil, and the Helicopter itself is always moving constantly, making it difficult to get a clean shot off. These are the Arguments i posted, but if for any reason my opponent wants to add any additional arguments, then so be it. But i would like my posted Arguments to be answered. Good Luck
boxxybabee

Con

I disagree. The nuclear bomb in Starcraft is quite the weapon. Not only can you surprise people with a cloaked ghost, but it also is literally DA BOMB.

Zergling Rush>Nukes any day, anyways. 4 drone, Spawning Pool, 6 ling, your opponent says GG.
Debate Round No. 1
monkeydude99

Pro

you do not understand how much i hate you right now for not actually posting a real debate. i wrote all this, for you to come and screw it up. so i ask, why did you do this?
boxxybabee

Con

As my opponent never refutes my points or back his up, he essentially agrees with me.

And my point about nukes being DAbOMB is pretty much a non-sequitur: it had nothing to do with this debate.

Zerg rush>Nukes>Flimsy CoD:MW2 metal rods that propels lead at high speeds.

<3
Debate Round No. 2
monkeydude99

Pro

Fine if you want me to rebuddle your useless garbage then i will. although i still dont know if your taking this seriously or not. Anyway, my job was not to refute YOUR points. Actually it was the opposite. I gave you my criteria for what should be debated, and two rounds into this now you have still failed to acknowledge any of my points about the guns or the killstreaks. I cant really debate with you if there is nothing argued by you
boxxybabee

Con

Actually it is your duty to refute my points, because I presented my arguments that disagree with yours.

As my opponent fails to refute or defend his case the obvious choice is CON.

:3
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Demosthenes 7 years ago
Demosthenes
Monkeydude99, I'll take this debate I'm an avid gamer and a bit of a MW2 fanatic.
Posted by monkeydude99 7 years ago
monkeydude99
Listen Boxxybabee, i dont hate you. You must understand how i feel though because i wrote all of this stuff, for you to bring up an irrelevent topic. Now yes, i assume you are right when you say, "You could've refuted my points but you didnt". The question to be answered is why was this off topic subject brought up in the first place? You tried to completely change the debate, am i right? I mean i asked certain questions, and brought up certain contentions, and you completely went off track. It is not my job to refute a point that doesnt relate to the topic at hand. This is the equivelent of Barack Obama bringing up something about baking muffins during a presidential debate. Just because he says it doesnt mean John McCain must argue it. Because in reality he would probably tell Obama to screw off. The same thing has happened here.
Posted by GeorgeCarlinWorshipper 7 years ago
GeorgeCarlinWorshipper
Conduct: PRO, for the same reason as stated by Nails.
Spelling/Grammar: CON, although I sincerely wish I could've voted PRO for this; however, that would be biased.
Arguments: PRO; CON's arguments regarding the resolution were virtually nonexistent.
Sources: PRO, as monkeydude99 actually cited numerous features of MW2.
Posted by boxxybabee 7 years ago
boxxybabee
You don't win unfortunately because you could've straight up said my arguments had nothing to do mw2; instead you choosed to say that you hate me. So it really was your win but you screwed it up...
Posted by Nails 7 years ago
Nails
Conduct: PRO
Boxxy really did wreck this debate.

Spelling: CON

Arguments: CON
PRO had 2 chances to rebut one of the worst non-sequiturs I've ever seen and didn't.
I actually believe boxxy here that: "it is your duty to refute my points, because I presented my arguments that disagree with yours."
Posted by monkeydude99 7 years ago
monkeydude99
boxxybabee: you must be joking. youre juust messing around here and you think your gonna win because you say i dont refute your points... But u do realize that you have no points for me to refute right? I posted something about modern warfare 2, and you brought some crazy and off topic thing into this, talking about zergling rushes. Which i have no idea wat that even is.... so i win
Posted by monkeydude99 7 years ago
monkeydude99
Cherymenthol-if you could have fun with this then accept my debate. i started a new debate that discusses the same topics. Accept if you want to debate it
Posted by Cherymenthol 7 years ago
Cherymenthol
You could have fun with this...
Posted by Rockylightning 7 years ago
Rockylightning
this really isn't a debate, more like a 2 minute discussion I agree with this comment made by XimenBao: "He might find someone to debate him, but I doubt he'll find many to vote."
Posted by studentathletechristian8 7 years ago
studentathletechristian8
Apologies, but I think video games are a waste of time. (Don't hurt me, mongeese ;)
13 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Tallek 7 years ago
Tallek
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by wolfmanthe 7 years ago
wolfmanthe
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by EHS_Debate 7 years ago
EHS_Debate
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Demosthenes 7 years ago
Demosthenes
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by kalyse020908 7 years ago
kalyse020908
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by jl153 7 years ago
jl153
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Awed 7 years ago
Awed
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Vote Placed by GeorgeCarlinWorshipper 7 years ago
GeorgeCarlinWorshipper
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Vote Placed by Nails 7 years ago
Nails
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:14 
Vote Placed by Cherymenthol 7 years ago
Cherymenthol
monkeydude99boxxybabeeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07