India should be a permanent UN Security Council Member
Debate Rounds (5)
Greetings everyone it is your friend Kylar :). I am starting a very relavant debate that I hope will be enjoyable for me and for my opponett :). In light of the growing momentum in favor of India getting a permanent membership on the UN Security Council, I think it is a good move. I want to debate this with someone :). Please accept, and I will explain my views more thoroughly in the next rounds.
Good luck, and let's have a great debate :)
PS: First round, acceptance only
Thank you for accepting this debate :). I will start my refutes.
"the tension between them and pakistan"
Pakistan could easily sign a diplomatic truce and end the Kashmir tension-let Kashmir be an independent nation, and end this rift.
China and Russia I might add also support the ascension of India as a permanent UNSC member.
I will explain more later,
thanks for the debate :)
I thank Con once again for an enjoyable debate so far, and very good arguments :). Now I must refute.
The fact is that China and Russia and the USA support India's ascension as a permanent member, so tension would ease there.
The terroist groups of ISIS and the Taliban would attack India probably yes, but Pakistan would not, not with most of the UNSC and the rest of the UN in support of India.
India's millitary could destroy the terrorists, they have an excellent and massive army.
Border disputes like Kashmir could be resolved at the UNSC with India's ascension as a permanent member of the UN Security Council. I rest my case.
Back to you my friend, and thank you for a great debate so far, I can't wait to see what you have in refutal :)
In truth, this has indeed been a great debate and thank you for it my friend :). I now will refute to the best of my ability.
You have very valid arguments, and that is no joke :).
Yes, I agree they should talk to the Islamic Republic of Iran before they grant India a seat on the UN Security Council, permanent or non permanent. They should also sign a nuclear deal with Iran, I agree with you there, Iran is dangerous, and is a threat to Israel and the world over.
Also, I think that in refutal the UNSC should grant India permament membership because they are a true nation of peace and they could help solve many conflicts.
Thank you again for a great debate my friend :)
Thank you my friend once again for a great debate :). This has been a very enjoyable debate, and I love hearing opposite views :). Let me now refute your great arguments :). I believe that yes, dipolmatic relationships with other nations must be resolved and soon, before India joins the UN Security Council, even as a permanent or non permanent member.
I think the UN could sponsor peace talks between India and Pakistan, and it they could reach an agreement ending the Kashmir dispute with Kashmir as a neutral nation between the two of them as a confilct settler. The terrorists could also be repelled by the members of India's strong millitary, and thus no harm would come to the world's largest democracy.
And yes, they do need to improve in some personal rights problems, but they have done remarkable. All it should take is a small nuge from the UN in diplomatic friendship, and they could finish what they started-equality and justice for all, regardless of religion, gender or otherwise. Once it is finished, then India can achieve it's goal: permanent membership on the UN Security Council.
I rest my case, thank you so much for a great debate my friend, i really enjoyed this :)
I hope to debate you again soon :) this was a great debate
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hanspete 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Sooooo Arguments go to Pro right off the Bat seeing as how he managed to successfully refute all of Con's points, as well as the fact that I believe that Pakistan has little relevance to the joining of India to the UNSC, especially seeing as India is a rising superpower and Pakistan is kinda sorta maybe a World Power. S and G also go to Pro seeing as Con made a few grammatical mistakes in his arguments and Pro also argued more fluidly.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.