The Instigator
suhailkk
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ws
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points

Indo US nuclear deal

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/24/2008 Category: Politics
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 574 times Debate No: 4790
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

suhailkk

Con

Democracy has become a laughing stock

in the Nuclear Deal issue: SIO

New Delhi (23/07/2008): Students Islamic Organisation of India central secretariat opined that democracy has become a laughing stock in the nuclear deal issue. The vote of confidence and the debate before motion was nothing other than a farce and humorous play and had already sent a harmful message regarding our democracy to the international community. Indo-US nuclear deal which is stated to be the mother of all deals and agreements made till date by India has not been subjected to serious debate in any of the houses of parliament of India. At the contrary, the two houses of American parliament has not only debated the agreement for long seven months but have also passed a law known as the Hyde Act which lays foundation of the 123 agreement. It's quite disappointing and painful that a deal which has serious and far reaching consequences in the determination of future foreign policy and future energy resources of our country, is going to be signed without an appropriate and truthful democratic procedure.

The central secretariat of SIO strongly demands the central government to refrain from the deal. Annual assessment and certification clause in the Hyde Act and various other clauses which give provision for the termination of the Deal are real threat to the sovereignty of India and independent foreign policy. The conditions of termination also includes, "Secure India's full and active participation in United States efforts to dissuade, isolate, and, if necessary, sanction and contain Iran .." [Section 103 (b) 4]. SIO strongly believes that the deal is not going to be a strategic civilian nuclear cooperation, but petty strategy to establish American hegemony in nuclear trade in Asia and is part of a larger interlocking program. Moreover, the power generated by nuclear energy is more costly than the one generated by coal and hydro power plants. Therefore, the deal will help us only to a marginal extent in addressing our primary energy needs. India had been far ahead than China in nuclear technology. But China made sporadic achievements since the last fifty years in the field by exercising its national will power, despite of the pressure created by USSR. We need this political will power and not thinking that we could attain advanced technology only after signing agreement with US
ws

Pro

DEMOCRACY HAS NEVER BECOME A LAUGHING STOCK.THEY ARE SIGNING THIS DEAL WITH LOT OF THINKING ONLY . IT IS GOOD FOR OUR FUTURE ONLY . INDIA IS AFAST DEVELOPING COUNTRY AND WE NEED LOT OF THINGS. TO RUN OUR NUCLEAR PLANTS TO GENERATE ELECTRICITY IS BECOMING MORE IMPORTANT.AS OUR INDUSTRIES ARE GROWING WE MUST PROVIDE THEM WITH PROPER FACILITIES LIKE ELECTRICITY.AS WE ALL KNOW THAT ELECTRICITY WHICH IS PRODUCED FROM COAL CANNOT EXIST FOR A LONG TIME BECAUSE COAL WILL NOT BE EXISTING FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS .SO WE WANT A LONG LASTING SOURCE.WITHOUT SIGNING A DEAL WITH US WE CAN'T GET URANIUM . AND WITHOUT GETING URANIUM WE CAN'T RUN OUR BUCLEAR PLANT.
THROUGH THIS THERE WILL BE MORE JOB OPPTUNITIES. ASJOB OPPURTUNITY IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE SECOND LARGEST COUNTRY INDIA SO NUCLEAR DEAL MUST HAPPEN
WE ARE SIGNING THIS DEAL AFTER ALONG DISCUSSION ONLY THATS WHY WE HAVE AFIGHT IN PARLIMENT OUR INDIA WHICH IS THE MOST DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY WILL HOLD DISCUSSIONS AND ONLY AFTER A LONG THINKING THEY WILL PROCEED TO SUCH A DEAL
3 Minutes Ago
Debate Round No. 1
suhailkk

Con

suhailkk forfeited this round.
ws

Pro

ws forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
suhailkk

Con

suhailkk forfeited this round.
ws

Pro

ws forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by dutts_sree 8 years ago
dutts_sree
hey ws r u aswathy (kv2)this is sree
Posted by ws 8 years ago
ws
SORRY , I HAVE POSTED MY ARGUMENT WITH COMMENTS. AFTER I HAVE CORRECTED IT EXTREMELY SORRY FOR MY MISTAKE
Posted by ws 8 years ago
ws
DEMOCRACY HAS NEVER BECOME A LAUGHING STOCK.THEY ARE SIGNING THIS DEAL WITH LOT OF THINKING ONLY . IT IS GOOD FOR OUR FUTURE ONLY . INDIA IS AFAST DEVELOPING COUNTRY AND WE NEED LOT OF THINGS. TO RUN OUR NUCLEAR PLANTS TO GENERATE ELECTRICITY IS BECOMING MORE IMPORTANT.AS OUR INDUSTRIES ARE GROWING WE MUST PROVIDE THEM WITH PROPER FACILITIES LIKE ELECTRICITY.AS WE ALL KNOW THAT ELECTRICITY WHICH IS PRODUCED FROM COAL CANNOT EXIST FOR A LONG TIME BECAUSE COAL WILL NOT BE EXISTING FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS .SO WE WANT A LONG LASTING SOURCE.WITHOUT SIGNING A DEAL WITH US WE CAN'T GET URANIUM . AND WITHOUT GETING URANIUM WE CAN'T RUN OUR BUCLEAR PLANT.
THROUGH THIS THERE WILL BE MORE JOB OPPTUNITIES. ASJOB OPPURTUNITY IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE SECOND LARGEST COUNTRY INDIA SO NUCLEAR DEAL MUST HAPPEN
WE ARE SIGNING THIS DEAL AFTER ALONG DISCUSSION ONLY THATS WHY WE HAVE AFIGHT IN PARLIMENT
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by vidh 8 years ago
vidh
suhailkkwsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by dutts_sree 8 years ago
dutts_sree
suhailkkwsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03