The Instigator
Gabyfink
Con (against)
Tied
3 Points
The Contender
gokuFNAF2
Pro (for)
Tied
3 Points

Instant Check Mate - Disclosure of crminal/ health records

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/30/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 470 times Debate No: 79192
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

Gabyfink

Con

I came across this website and I'm horrorized. Even if we can admitt the right of the people to be informed about crimes, is it acceptable that there is zero restriction to the difussion of highly personal information? As opposed to the copyright that at least allows to restrisct the information to its knwoledege but forbids us from copy it or reproduce it or commercialize it. I accep the monopoly of the State to make these records public, but the manipulation of this date in hands of unregulated organizations is scary
Debate Round No. 1
Gabyfink

Con

Excuseme? What does "ok" mean in this context?
gokuFNAF2

Pro

I said "okay" not "ok"
Debate Round No. 2
Gabyfink

Con

Let me give you the source that I read and that may inspire a more profound argument on your end: http://www.instantcheckmate.com...
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by gokuFNAF2 2 years ago
gokuFNAF2
NOON ONNO NNONON NO, Greg, VOTE PROO111111
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Sarra 2 years ago
Sarra
GabyfinkgokuFNAF2Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: After clicking that link, I decided to search a friend up on it. I wasted 15 minutes to get to a screen where I could pay $10.61/mo to view the report of my friend. No thx. Following gokuFNAF2's advice of "who cares" would have saved me lots of time. This is why I voted goku for more convincing argument.
Vote Placed by Greg4586 2 years ago
Greg4586
GabyfinkgokuFNAF2Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con brings up the argument against the disclosure of personal records. The only argument Pro gives is "Okay" so I'm going to vote for Con