Introverts should be locked up

Introverts should be locked up and never taken out just for being introverts. First round acceptance.

I accept, however, I would like to clarify the definition of introverted:
Introverted: Marked by interest in or preoccupation with oneself or one's own thoughts as opposed to others or the environment; shy or reserved.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com...

Yep that looks good. You start first.

Since my opponent has not given me anything to dispute, I will start my arguments:

1. For my opponent to say that "introverts should be locked up" for life is preposterous. As both of us live in the United States, I shall start there. To start locking people up solely because of their personality completely violates everything the U.S. was built on. It's like throwing people in jail because of their skin, eyes, hair, etc. There is absolutely no way you could convince anyone of that.
2. Introverts make up 25-40% of the population, and 60% of the gifted population. What does this say about introverts? Many introverts do not think they can be leaders because they don't have as great of people skills as extroverts. But really, they are better leaders, as they are less likely to make rash decisions. Introverts think before they speak, and are level headed and calm in crisis. Therefore, this makes them better leaders, even though there are not as outgoing. As Albus Dumbledore said:
"It is a curious thing, but perhaps those who are best suited to power are those who have never sought it."
http://www.techrepublic.com...
http://jarrod1240.hubpages.com...

As this has become an introverted versus extroverted debate, I shall also define extrovert:
Extrovert: A person concerned primarily with the physical and social environment ( opposed to introvert).
http://dictionary.reference.com...
As many people just think "extrovert" means outgoing, this is not exactly true. Actually, it means that they thrive around other people, it "energizes" them, and they can't stand being alone.
http://giftedkids.about.com...

Mak-zie:
"There is absolutely no way you could convince anyone of that."-Bribing, obviously.

Introverts are too shy and we need people to take charge.
My opponent fails to convince people of why introverts should stay free. My opponent fails to convince me, and no one will believe her.

Obviously introverts need to be locked up and extinct to society forever. This does not violate anything as people judge other's by their personalities all the time. This debate is over.

Introverts should not be "locked up and extinct to society forever." It is morally wrong and unethical.
I would also like to point out that that is impossible to completely get rid of introverts, as even two extroverted people can have an introverted child, so there is no point in alienating the population of introverted people.

And contrary to what my opponent has said it does violate the constitution, and I will try to state a few below:

14 and 15 Amendments-Citizens born in the U.S. have equal privileges. Brown vs. Board of Education (Supreme Court Case) furthers this amendment as to "stop discrimination." Discriminating against introverts violates this.
http://www.core-online.org...
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com...

8th Amendment-Stops the government from inflicting "cruel and unusual punishment." It is very much cruel and unusual punishment to lock up innocent people because they were born a certain way.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...

5th Amendment-No person can be convicted of crime unless tried by a fair jury. At the very least, the innocent people would have to have been tried by a jury first before being convicted.
http://www.law.cornell.edu...
These are just a few I tried to name-no doubt there are more.

Conclusion:
Let it be known to all that Pro dropped many of my arguments and gave very little arguments as a whole. Not to mention the absurd statement on which this debate was set on. Also, I want to be clear that introverted people should not be locked up ANYWHERE-not just in the U.S. It was an example on which I could set forth data, but it applies world-wide. I repeat, this applies worldwide.
Your personality is who you are and you're way of life, without it you are not yourself. Taking that away or prosecuting that would be one of the greatest losses of the world, and I hope it never actually happens.
Finally, I would like to thank my opponent for this debate, because although absurd, it was actually very enjoyable.